Energy and Environment
Congressional Newsletter
Periodic updates to Congress on RAND's work in Energy and Environment

What Can We Learn from Abroad About Improving Energy Performance of Buildings?

The Montgomery Park Business Center in Baltimore, Maryland featuring green roof technology, photo courtesy of www.nrel.gov

More than a third of primary energy use in developed countries is used to heat, cool, and light buildings. Thus, commercial real estate provides opportunities to achieve substantial potentially low-cost improvements in energy efficiency. In recent years, the European Union (EU) and its member nations and states in the Australian Commonwealth have pioneered policies to promote energy efficiency in buildings and to rectify behaviors that make energy efficiency difficult to achieve. A new RAND study examines how these policies have worked and draws implications for the potential design of similar U.S. public policies.

The study examines policy tools to improve building efficiency, including building codes, energy efficiency ratings, the role of public buildings, the training and certification of experts, and the issuance of tradable "white certificates"—tradable rights based on improving the energy efficiency of buildings. The study found that the experiences of Europe and Australia suggest that effective policies to promote energy efficiency in buildings could include information disclosure, building codes, and ratings. However, the rollout of such policies and their consistent implementation pose special challenges.

In terms of the implications for U.S. policymakers, the study concludes that building-materials manufacturers will be able to better standardize their products if there is regional consistency in energy efficiency requirements for building codes; that energy performance certificates should be understandable and meaningful enough to affect market behavior; that widespread energy efficiency gains will need to involve retrofitting and making operational improvements to existing buildings, as well as codes for new buildings; that public buildings should continue to be a test bed for new energy-saving ideas and should promote awareness of building energy-performance levels; and that building energy-efficiency programs could play roles in a cap-and-trade program for reducing emissions of carbon dioxide.

Read the Report: Improving the Energy Performance of Buildings: Learning from the European Union and Australia

Assessing the Viability of Alternative Jet Fuels in the Short-Term

jet fueling

From 2003 through mid-2008, the rise in world oil prices precipitated a corresponding rise in the price of jet fuel. Higher prices for jet fuel contributed to the bankruptcy of several airlines and was one factor motivating other airlines to merge. All economic sectors, including aviation, are also experiencing growing pressure to reduce their greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions. In addition, emissions from aviation also degrade air quality near airports. But the commercial aviation sector has few alternative-energy options to petroleum-based fuels.

A joint study by RAND and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) assessed alternative jet fuels that could be available commercially in the next decade using primarily North American resources.

The study found that three alternative fuels not derived from conventional petroleum may be available in commercial quantities—several tens of thousands of barrels per day—during the next decade: (1) Jet A derived from Canadian oil sands and Venezuela's very heavy oils (VHOs); (2) Fischer-Tropsch (FT) jet fuel produced from coal, a combination of coal and biomass, or natural gas; and (3) hydroprocessed renewable jet (HRJ) fuel produced by hydroprocessing renewable oils. All these fuels are compatible with the current infrastructure or easily can be made compatible by using additives.

The study offers several recommendations based on these findings. These include ensuring that measures designed to lower GHG emissions are broad and place a price on GHG emissions—allowing economically efficient choices to be made across many sectors—and that measures designed to promote alternative-fuel use in aviation consider the potentially large GHG releases associated with land-use changes required for cultivating crops for producing biomass or renewable oils. Additionally, the study recommends considering the adoption of a reduced-sulfur standard or a ULS jet fuel to improve air quality and supporting long-term fundamental research on creating alternative middle-distillate fuels for use in ground transportation and aviation.

Read the Report: Near-Term Feasibility of Alternative Jet Fuels


RESEARCHER PROFILE

Charles P. Ries

Charles P. Ries

Ambassador Ries joined RAND as a senior fellow in February 2009, having served as Coordinator for Economic Transition at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad and in numerous other diplomatic foreign assignments. At State Department headquarters, Mr. Ries worked on international energy and G-7/G-8 Summits, among other issues. Ambassador Ries is the recipient of the State Department's "Cordell Hull" Award for Senior Economic Officers, "Rockwell Schnabel" Award for Contributions to U.S.-EU Relations, the Distinguished Honor Award, Presidential Meritorious Service Award, and several Superior Honor Awards. For his service in Iraq he was also awarded the Department of Army's Outstanding Civil Service Medal. Mr. Ries holds B.A. and M.A. degrees from the Johns Hopkins University.

Read more about Mr. Ries »


Research on Global and Local Water Issues

Water managers have to deal both with growing demands for water in their regions and with the impacts that global climate change will have on the end-users—businesses and homeowners—who are trying to manage their own water-efficiency issues. For RAND research on both global and local water issues, see our previous Energy and Environment Newsletter.


RAND CONGRESSIONAL RESOURCES STAFF

Lindsey Kozberg
Vice President, Office of External Affairs

Shirley Ruhe
Director, Office of Congressional Relations

Jennifer Warren
Energy and Environment Legislative Analyst

RAND Office of Congressional Relations
(703) 413-1100, ext. 5395


RELATED LINKS

RAND Environment, Energy, and Economic Development Program

RAND Gulf States Policy Institute

Energy and Environment Research Area

Congressional Resources on Energy and Environment

RAND Congressional Web Site

RAND Web Site

RSS RAND RSS Feeds


SUBSCRIPTIONS

To unsubscribe, please write to ocr@rand.org or call (703) 413-1100, ext. 5395.

Members of Congress and staff may receive a free copy by writing to ocr@rand.org or calling (703) 413-1100, ext. 5395.

RAND can also provide briefings, research assistance, testimony, and other services to Congressional offices.

Sign Up Sign up for other RAND Congressional Newsletters.

The RAND Environment, Energy, and Economic Development Program conducts research and analysis on environmental quality and regulation, energy resources and systems, water resources and systems, climate, agriculture, oceans, natural hazards and disasters, and economic development. To access our research, please visit our Web site at http://www.rand.org/ise/environ/.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world.

Learn More »

Copyright © 2009 RAND Corporation. 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401-3208. RAND® is a registered trademark.

View this newsletter on the web »