Supreme Court Upholds the Affordable Care Act: What the Experts Are Saying

June 28, 2012

Today's Supreme Court decision to uphold most of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)—and most notably, the individual mandate that all Americans purchase health insurance or pay a financial penalty—is likely the most significant health care-related ruling in U.S. history.

When President Barack Obama signed the bill into law in March 2010, the American health care system seemed destined for sweeping reform. Yet constitutional challenges soon surfaced, with two such cases climbing the judicial hierarchy and landing in the Supreme Court, threatening the President's signature legislative achievement.

Now that key provisions of the president's reform have survived the process and a mixed ruling on Medicaid expansion has prevailed, what lies ahead for health care in America? RAND experts sound off in the wake of the Court's momentous decision.

Future of Medicaid Still Uncertain

Christine Eibner

With most of the key provisions of the Affordable Care Act upheld, we expect close to 30 million Americans to gain health insurance coverage. Yet the part of the ruling dealing with Medicaid is significant. We don't know how many states will respond, and it will take thoughtful, quantitative analysis to gain insight into this. Our next challenge will be to analyze the effects of states opting out of Medicaid expansion, and how this might influence insurance coverage, exchange enrollment, and federal spending on subsidies.

Christine Eibner, economist

Learn More

Program Design Key to Achieving ACA's Goals

Cheryl Damberg

As federal and state policymakers move to implement the ACA, there are a plethora of decisions that must be made about how to structure the program elements. These decisions and the evolution of health care reform can be improved by the independent, objective analyses that RAND can provide. We can help identify best approaches to program design and implementation, and how to assess the impact of the ACA in achieving better quality, lower costs, and improved health. RAND's work in the area of pay-for-performance and value-based purchasing is one example of how RAND is helping policymakers design incentive programs to improve quality and lower costs.

Cheryl L. Damberg, senior policy researcher

Learn More

With Ruling Settled, Reform Can Begin

Peter Hussey

The ACA contains a myriad of provisions to reduce health care costs and improve quality independent of the mandate. For example, reforms have advanced primary care in ‘patient-centered medical homes’ and ‘bundled payments’ for common episodes of care have been taking root, but could potentially accelerate in the private sector with federal funding confirmed. Now that the uncertainty of the Supreme Court decision has been lifted, transformation of health care delivery can move rapidly ahead.

Peter Hussey, policy researcher

Learn More

Supreme Court Not the Only Group Whose Decisions Matter

The passage of the law and this ruling are the start of health care reform, not the end. There are now many decisions to be made. State governments need to make preparations for the insurance exchanges and the expansion of Medicaid. Health insurance companies must ensure their offerings are in compliance with the law. Businesses should assess the impact of the new options on their employees to determine if they should continue to offer health insurance. Health care providers need to assess whether they have the capacity to provide care to as many as 30 million newly insured Americans. Finally, individuals should look at the new options that will be open to them in 2014.

— Carter C. Price, mathematician

Learn More

  • Blog

    Five Years of the Affordable Care Act

    Mar 23, 2015

    The Affordable Care Act has officially been part of the U.S. health care landscape for five years. We reflect on the twists and turns that followed its passage and the RAND research that informed debates along the way, and look ahead to the future of the ACA.

  • Commentary

    Exchange Tax Credits or Employer Coverage: What's Better for Low-Income Americans?

    Feb 12, 2015

    As the King v. Burwell case approaches, there's likely to be more discussion about potential modifications to the ACA's tax credit structure. Policymakers might consider whether there are opportunities to level the playing field for low-income workers, regardless of whether their employers offer insurance.

  • Commentary

    Open Enrollment, Take 2: What Matters for the ACA Marketplace?

    Feb 11, 2015

    As the Affordable Care Act's second open-enrollment period draws to its February 15 close, relatively few of the millions of Americans eligible to switch plans have revisited their options. What actions can be taken to ensure that people know they have the right to a new choice each year?

  • Research Brief

    How Does Enrollment of Young Invincibles Affect Premiums in the ACA Individual Market?

    Feb 5, 2015

    Using the COMPARE microsimulation model, researchers estimated the effects of reduced enrollment of young adults (invincibles) in the individual health insurance market. Results indicate that reduced enrollment of invincibles is associated with only modest premium increases.

  • Multimedia

    Premium Tax Credits and the Affordable Care Act: The Potential Ramifications of King v. Burwell

    Feb 3, 2015

    In this February 2015 Congressional Briefing, Christine Eibner discusses the role of premium tax credits in ensuring stability in the individual health insurance marketplace and the ramifications of King v. Burwell on the Affordable Care Act.