Pardee Center

The RAND Frederick S. Pardee Center for Longer Range Global Policy and the Future Human Condition was established in 2001 through a generous $5 million pledge from RAND alumnus Frederick S. Pardee. The RAND Pardee Center aims to enhance the overall future quality and condition of human life by aggressively disseminating and applying new methods for long-term policy analysis in a wide variety of policy areas where they are needed most.

The Pardee Center organizes its activities around two main themes: (1) advancing the state-of the-art in conducting long-term policy analysis so organizations can implement better long-range policy; and (2) developing and disseminating approaches that will help make proper stewardship for the future be more commonly practiced.

Future WorkforceHow Americans Will Live and Work in 2020: A Workshop Supported by the Rockefeller Foundation — Jun 2011

RAND’s Pardee Center for Longer Range Global Policy and the Future Human Condition, along with the RAND Center for Global Risk and Security (CRGS) and the Research and Policy in International Development (RAPID) center, hosted a workshop for public sector policy makers, NGOs and advocacy groups, members of the media, experts in consumer and workplace trends from the private sector, academics, RAND researchers, and Rockefeller Foundation staff to identify key trends and emerging issues that will most significantly affect the social sector’s work with America’s poor and vulnerable populations

water resourcesPardee Center Researchers Support the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Blue Ribbon Committee — Apr 2011

RAND supported Metropolitan's Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC) to develop recommendations to the Metropolitan Board for a new business model for the agency that will enable it to meet its goals over the next fifty years. The final BRC report was presented the Metropolitan Board on April 12, 2011.

Some Thoughts on the Role of Robust Control Theory in Climate-related Decision Support — July 2011

Climate Change Decision Support

Any successful response to climate change—both the challenges of limiting the magnitude of future climate change and adapting to its impacts—will clearly involve policies that evolve over time in response to new information and that are robust over a wide range of difficult-to-predict future conditions. This article recently published in the journal Climate Change by Rob Lempert and Shawn McKay, discusses robust control theory as one means to evaluate such robust and adaptive policies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

The Future of Water in Southern California — May 24, 2011

California Aquaduct, from Flickr photostream by ZoO?!

Rob Lempert presents at “The Future of Water in Southern California: A Presentation and Discussion on the Metropolitan Water District’s Blue Ribbon Committee Report” at UCLA.

Managing Climate Risks in Developing Countries with Robust Decision Making — May 2011

Climate Risks in Developing Countries

Robust Decision Making is being used by many natural resource agencies in the United States and other developed countries to support planning for climate change adaptation and to overcome many of the organizational and implementation barriers that, with more traditional approaches, make it difficult to plan for climate change. An article, by Robert Lempert and Nidhi Kalra, in World Resources Report explains how RDM can help water managers plan for climate change.

Decision Making in an Uncertain World — May 20, 2011

Climate Change

The Australian National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility invited Rob Lempert to give a presentation on “Dealing with Uncertainty” for Australian researchers and decision makers as part of a master class on “Climate Adaptation: from Theory to Implementation” May 20, 2011

Rob Lempert in Residence at the World Bank to Assist with Climate Change Adaptation Programs — Apr 2011

Robert Lempert

For a week in April 2011, Rob Lempert spent time with World Bank staff providing technical assistance and engaging in discussions about how Robust Decision Making approaches might prove useful in World Bank projects involving climate change.

Governing Geoengineering Research - A Political and Technical Vulnerability Analysis of Potential Near-Term Options — Apr 19, 2011

Geoengineering is risky, but could transform the portfolio of options for limiting future climate change. Some geoengineering approaches could prove fast acting and inexpensive and could be deployed by one or a few nations without global cooperation. This report provides an initial examination and comparison of the risks associated with alternative international approaches the United States might pursue to governing geoengineering research and deployment.

Some Current Projects Associated with the Pardee Center

Identifying Key Indicators for Adaptive Management of the Los Angeles Metropolitan Integrated Resources Plan— Jun 2011
The Los Angeles Metropolitan Water District’s 2010 Integrated Resource Plan Update describes a preferred resource mix that would meet projected demand and most expected contingencies through 2035. However, recognizing that Metropolitan and the region face many significant uncertainties over the next 25 years, the Plan also describes an adaptive management approach that will monitor key trends and modify the preferred resource mix as necessary. In this project, RAND is assisting Metropolitan to determine which trends it should most usefully monitor in order to implement this adaptive management strategy.

Using RDM to Manage Climate and Other Uncertainties in EPA’s National Water Program— May 2011
RAND is undertaking a project for the EPA to determine the utility of Robust Decision Making (RDM) methods for evaluating the agency’s needs and priorities under the National Water Program. EPA may find RDM valuable because providing safe and reliable drinking water supplies and managing water quality and ecosystem health present a challenge of decision making under conditions of deep uncertainty. Maintaining safe and reliable supplies depends on timely investments in water treatment, storage, and delivery infrastructure, and the success of these investment decisions relies on predictions about water availability, system needs, and infrastructure performance many decades into the future. The project will culminate in two pilot RDM applications on NWP activities to test the applicability and usefulness of such methods for the future.

Testing the Scenario Hypothesis: The Effect of Alternative Characterizations of Uncertainty on Decision Structuring
There is much current interest in decision support approaches to help improve groups’ and individuals’ ability to make difficult decisions, such as those planners must make when considering uncertain, long-term environmental changes. This project, supported by the National Science Foundation in partnership with researchers at Columbia University, is aimed at testing the hypothesis that decision support processes that employ scenarios to characterize deep uncertainty will help contentious groups make more effective decisions than decision support processes that characterize uncertainty using a single set of best-estimate probability distributions. Testing this scenario hypothesis requires an experimental design where decision makers can augment the initial choice set by designing additional options – uncommon in judgment and decision making experiments because it can prove difficult to give subjects the flexibility to design new decision options while nonetheless working within a believable set of constraints. To address this challenge, the proposed experiments will focus on a real-world decision – managing a fishery.

My RAND ?

Saved Items

Recommended