RAND Institute for Civil Justice
Featured at ICJ

The most comprehensive analysis of the risk of malpractice claims by physician specialty in more than two decades finds that U.S. physicians have a greater than 75% career-long risk of facing litigation. In some specialties, doctors can be virtually certain of a lawsuit over the course of their careers. Read More »

Following the passage of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued a set of controversial rules on whistleblower awards and protections, which RAND recently convened a symposium to discuss. Read More »

The residential insurance market along the U.S. Gulf Coast has not functioned well since the devastating 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons. Policymakers, deeply divided about how to improve the system, have been unable to build consensus for reform. Read More »

Asbestos bankruptcy trusts—created to compensate people injured by the mineral—may be influencing tort cases. The current way that the trusts and the tort cases are linked together may result in payments that are not consistent with the basic principles of the tort liability system. Read More »

In California's workers compensation system, the permanently disabled have historically displayed poor rates of return to work and high levels of lost earnings. Several large changes to the CA workers comp system over the last ten years may not have had the intended effect. Read More »

The U.S. malpractice system is widely regarded as inefficient, in part because of how long cases take to resolve. Malpractice reforms should be assessed by how well they reduce litigation time without undermining patients' needs.

Hedge funds did not play a pivotal role in the financial crisis compared to other agents, such as credit rating agencies, mortgage lenders, and issuers of credit default swaps. However, hedge funds do have the potential to contribute to disruptions of the U.S. financial system.

An examination of state appellate court judge pay across the United States from 1977 to 2007 shows that judicial salaries have a small but significant effect on the length of judicial tenure, and a small effect on the background of judges that join the appellate bench. A more limited analysis of California trial court judges finds far more sensitivity to pay, however, suggesting that trial and appellate court judges may behave differently.

Some argue that the confidentiality of the civil justice system keeps it working efficiently and fairly; others argue that the public is being denied information about hazards that may cause harm. A balanced approach to increasing transparency can improve the system, raise public confidence, and protect litigants' privacy.

When enacting, implementing, and evaluating health care reform, policymakers should consider potential spillover effects on workers' compensation insurance. The experience of Massachusetts's heath care reform suggests that reform may reduce medical costs.