Institute for Civil Justice Research Agenda

The RAND Institute for Civil Justice provides valuable products to help all contenders understand the issues of the day. We use empirical and objective research methods to search out the root causes of system problems and identify the best fixes. We locate and sometimes create common ground among adversaries. We gather data and interpret it for policymakers. And in the broadest sense, because we work to make the system more efficient and equitable for all, we help protect society from the economic and social costs of a system that could become arbitrary and capricious.

Administration of Justice

"Just, speedy, and inexpensive"—How well do the courts meet these standards? The ICJ researches ways that court management can be improved.

Alternative Dispute Resolution

As legislatures and courts continue to expand mandates for ADR in federal and state courts, the need to know what, in fact, the ADR revolution has wrought, for good or ill, becomes more pressing.

Asbestos Litigation

Understanding and quantifying asbestos litigation compensation and costs can help policymakers assess how best to resolve future claims for everyone involved.

Auto Personal Injury Compensation

Our research is aimed at finding ways to improve auto personal injury compensation for all stakeholders.

Catastrophic Risk Management

ICJ seeks to improve the complex system of public and private compensation for losses of life and property caused by natural disasters and terrorist attacks.

Class Actions & Mass Torts

By shifting the focus of the class action debate to improving the way these suits are litigated, antagonists can find common ground.

Environmental Issues

Our goal is to help decisionmakers design pragmatic policies that improve the environment through cost-effective means.

Expert Evidence

In short, the Daubert decision requires the judge to act as a gatekeeper—letting reliable and relevant science in and keeping the rest out.

Juries & Verdicts

Throughout its history, the ICJ has provided crucial and otherwise unavailable information on jury behavior and verdicts in the civil justice system.

Product Liability

Our analyses show that the issue is more complex than indicated by the policy debate about whether there is either "too much" or "too little" product liability.