CCEG News and Events

Improving corporate ethics and public policy through objective, empirical research and analysis.

CCEG to Cosponsor Event with Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance — May 3, 2011

On May 3, 2011, the CCEG will cosponsor a seminar with the University of Delaware's John L. Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance. The event will address the role of boards of directors in overseeing compliance and ethics, particularly within financial institutions. This opportunity provides a valuable platform for discussion on this important topic, and builds upon the findings in CCEG's 2010 conference report, Directors as Guardians of Compliance and Ethics Within the Corporate Citadel: What the Policy Community Should Know.

CCEG Holds Policy Symposium Featuring the Chairman of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC) — Mar. 28, 2011

On March 28, 2011, CCEG held a Policy Symposium luncheon with featured speaker, Phil Angelides, Chairman of the FCIC. During the symposium, titled "Lessons Learned from the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission," Angelides discussed his experience on the Commission's 10-member bipartisan panel as well as the Commission's findings relating to the causes of the nation's financial and economic crisis. The event was co-hosted by the RAND Institute for Civil Justice and the UCLA-RAND Center for Law and Public Policy.

National Association of Corporate Directors Event Features CCEG Director as Moderator — Mar. 2, 2011

Michael Greenberg, director of the RAND Center for Corporate Ethics and Governance, moderated the discussion at the NACD Three Rivers Chapter, Brave New World: Transformation of Corporate Governance or An Era of Regulatory Reform on March 2. The event featured RAND trustee, James E. Rohr, chairman and CEO of PNC Financial services, and director of Blackrock, EQT, ATI, and International Monetary Conference.

CCEG Study Cited Extensively by SEC — Jan. 31, 2011

The January 2011 SEC report, "Study on Investment Advisers and Broker-Dealers," cites heavily from the CCEG publication, Investor and Industry Perspectives on Investment Advisers and Broker-Dealers. Pages 96-99 of the new report summarize the RAND study findings in support of the argument that there exists "retail investor confusion" regarding roles and obligations of investment advisers and broker-dealers.

CCEG Director Provides Remarks to the Pittsburgh Venture Capital Association — Dec. 14, 2010

Michael Greenberg, director of the RAND Center for Corporate Ethics and Governance, addressed the December meeting of the Pittsburgh Venture Capital Association. His speech, "Corporate Governance and Regulation: Issues and Some Thoughts Concerning Venture Capital," focused on a number of current legislative issues of interest to those involved in venture capital. In particular, Greenberg remarked on the impact of recent policy changes under both the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

CCEG Hosts Semi-Annual Advisory Board Dinner and Meeting — Dec. 2-3, 2010

The advisory board dinner of the RAND Center for Corporate Ethics and Governance took place on December 2, 2010 at the Ritz Carlton in Pentagon City, and featured keynote speaker Robert Hunter, RAND senior advisor and former U.S. Ambassador to NATO. The advisory board meeting commenced the following morning at RAND's Pentagon City offices. The CCEG thanks its advisory board members for their participation at the meeting and throughout the year.

The Washington Post Cites CCEG Study — Nov. 27, 2010

The Washington Post's article, "Whose investment advice can you trust?," references the CCEG's oft-cited publication, "Investor and Industry Perspectives on Investment Advisers and Broker-Dealers." The article highlights the study's finding that the average investor fails to understand the key distinctions between broker-dealers and registered investment advisers.

Center Director to Chair Southwest Litigation Summit — May 2-4, 2010

Michael Greenberg, Director of the RAND Center for Corporate Ethics and Governance, chaired the Southwest Litigation Summit 2010 on May 2-4 in Phoenix, Arizona. The event served as a forum for in-house litigators to strategize on the best practices related to augmented corporate defense and representation.

The Wall Street Journal Quotes Center Director, Michael Greenberg — Mar. 1, 2010

In the The Wall Street Journal article, "Trust Isn't A Given," the RAND Center for Corporate Ethics and Governance Director, Michael Greenberg, comments on the legal distinctions between standards for investment advisers and broker dealers. The article refers to the Center study, "Investor and Industry Perspectives on Investment Advisers and Broker-Dealers," and its finding that many investors do not have an understanding of the difference between brokers and advisers.

Center Study Cited in The New York Times — Feb. 15, 2010

A recent article in The New York Times, "Struggling Over a Rule for Brokers," cited the RAND Center for Corporate Ethics and Governance report, "Investor and Industry Perspectives on Investment Advisers and Broker-Dealers." The report was commissioned by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and concluded that trends in the financial services industry over the past 15 years have blurred the boundaries between broker-dealers, which are regulated by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and investment advisers, which are subject to the Investment Adviser Act of 1940. As a result, the average investor fails to understand the key distinctions between broker-dealers and investment advisers.

SEC Chair Quotes Center Research — Jun. 18, 2009

Mary Schapiro, SEC Chairwoman and former member of the RAND Center for Corporate Ethics and Governance Advisory Board, cited the Center's study, "Investor and Industry Perspectives on Investment Advisers and Broker-Dealers," in her recent address to the New York Financial Writers' Association.

Preventing and Detecting Corporate Misdeeds: Ethics and Compliance Officers Offer Advice for Policymakers — Apr. 9, 2009

Improvements in corporate compliance, ethics, and oversight have been a significant policy goal for the U.S. government at least since the enactment of the U.S. Federal Sentencing Guidelines in 1991 and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002. Notwithstanding these earlier government initiatives, the collapse of financial markets in late 2008 has invited renewed questions about the governance, compliance, and ethics practices of firms throughout the U.S. economy. On March 5, 2009, RAND convened a conference in Washington, D.C., on the role and perspectives of corporate chief ethics and compliance officers (CECOs) in supporting organizations in the detection and prevention of corporate misdeeds. The conference brought together leaders from among ethics and compliance officers in the corporate community, as well as stakeholders in the nonprofit sector, academia, and government. Discussions focused on the challenges facing corporate ethics and compliance programs as a first line of defense against malfeasance and misbehavior; on the role of CECOs as champions for implementation in their companies; and on potential steps that might be taken by government to empower CECOs and, by extension, the corporate ethics and compliance programs that they oversee.

"The Unintended Effects of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002" was recently listed on SSRN's Top Ten download list for "Corporate Governance & Accounting" and "Corporate Governance & Law" — Feb. 17, 2009

The auditing profession came under intense scrutiny following the collapse of Enron and several other leading firms. Legislators responded swiftly with the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, widely considered the most comprehensive economic regulation since the New Deal. An important strand in the accounting literature, led in part by authors such as DeFond & Francis (2005) and Baker (2008) suggests the law may produce serious unintended harmful consequences. This has produced a call for further research to evaluate the law's impact upon firms. This paper contributes to this literature in several ways. First, it conducts a comprehensive analysis of multiple literatures to formulate key hypotheses. Second, the strength of these hypotheses is evaluated on a random sample of Fortune 500 CEOs (n = 206), the first scholarly attempt to evaluate managerial perception of the law. The survey results generally support our hypotheses, and this knowledge is intended to improve the regulatory development process in the future. As this is not a cost: benefit analysis, no effort was made to evaluate the potential benefits of the law, and no conclusions are drawn regarding the law's net effect(s).

President-elect Obama chooses Mary Schapiro, Advisory Board Member, to lead the SEC — Dec. 18, 2008

President-elect Obama has chosen Mary Schapiro, Advisory Board Member to the RAND Center for Corporate Ethics and Governance (CCEG), to lead the SEC. We are encouraged that the SEC will have the benefit of her outstanding leadership. Ms. Schapiro will join Timothy Geithner, a member of the RAND Board of Trustees and nominee as Treasury Secretary, in steering the country toward economic recovery and renewed confidence in our financial markets. While we regret Ms. Schapiro will no longer be available to advise RAND, we wish her the best of luck and are committed to providing her with the unbiased, objective information she will need to be successful in her new position.

My RAND ?

Saved Items

Recommended