Document Information
Implications for Model Validation of Multiresolution, Multiperspective Modeling (MRMPM) and Exploratory Analysis
This monograph draws upon a number of the authors' past studies to illustrate with concrete examples how multiresolution, multiperspective modeling (MRMPM) and exploratory analysis relate to model validation when the models are not solidly based in settled theory or empirical testing appropriate to the application in question. It is argued that in such cases, the validation process might reasonably assess a model and its associated databases as "valid for exploratory analysis" or "valid, subject to the principal assumptions underlying the model, for exploratory analysis" for a particular context. A model and its data may not be fully "valid," but they may still be both useful and good in more-limited ways. It is important that a model being assessed be comprehensible and explainable, and that its data deal effectively with uncertainty, possibly massive uncertainty. Crucial enabling capabilities are provided by multiresolution, multiperspective modeling, including use of families of models and games, and exploratory analysis. These methods are valuable for extrapolating, generalizing, and abstracting from small sets of analyses accomplished with detailed models; for top-down planning; and for providing broad, synoptic assessments of problem areas. They are also important for achieving a deep understanding of problems and communicating insights credibly to others.
See Also:
Support RAND Research — Buy This Product!
Paperback Cover Price: $18.00
Discounted Web Price: $16.20
Pages: 84
ISBN/EAN: 0-8330-3482-0
Free, downloadable PDF file(s) are available below.
RAND makes an electronic version of this document available for free as a public service. If you find this information valuable, please consider purchasing a paper copy of the full document to help support RAND research.
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.
Contents
Chapter One:
Introduction
Chapter Two:
Validation-Related Reasons for Multiple Levels of Resolution and Exploratory Analysis
Chapter Three:
Consistency and Validation
Chapter Four:
Motivated Metamodels, Explanations, and the Importance of a Good Story
Appendix A:
Using a Simple Model to Explain, Extrapolate From, and Provide Face Validity of Complex-Model Results
Appendix B:
Using a Low-Resolution Calculation to Check a High-Resolution Calculation
Appendix C:
Selecting a Good Test Set of Detailed Scenarios
Appendix D:
Illustrations of the Use of Consistency Definitions
Appendix E:
Basing Extrapolation on a Story
Appendix F:
Motivated Metamodels
The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force. The research was conducted in RAND's Project AIR FORCE.
The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
* RAND research is conducted across divisions, centers, and projects; these organizational components are represented in the "Related RAND Divisions" section above.
Top
RAND® is a registered trademark. Copyright © 1994-2008 RAND Corporation. 