5. The Business/Financial Dimension of the Information Revolution
Moderator: C. Richard Neu
Speakers: Jim Norton and Colin Crook
Rapporteur: Richard Hundley
The next session of the conference was devoted to a discussion of the business
and financial dimension of the information revolution. It focused in
particular on two aspects of IT-driven changes in the business and financial
world: electronic commerce, and new models for the internal organization and
functioning of business enterprises and for their external interactions with
customers, suppliers, and competitors.
Electronic Commerce
The first speaker discussed electronic commerce, using recent developments in
the United Kingdom as a point of departure.[6]
Why E-Commerce Is Important
As viewed by the speaker, electronic commerce is important for several
reasons:
- Its dramatic growth and potential. According to the speaker,
the speed of adoption of e-commerce is unprecedented. While electronic
data interchange between large companies has developed steadily over the last
fifteen years, there has recently been an explosion of growth in retail
e-commerce and in transactional use by small business.
Industry forecasts have consistently underestimated e-commerce growth. In the
U.S. business to business e-commerce is now expected to reach $1 trillion by
2003. Similarly, business to consumer e-commerce is thought to have reached $7
billion in 1998 and to be on track to reach between $40 billion and $80 billion
by 2002. This suggests that the current pattern, where at least 80% of
e-commerce revenues fall in the business-to-business segment, is being
maintained. In the UK, e-commerce revenues are expected to reach $4.5 billion
for 1999, rising to $47 billion by 2002.
- The major impact it will have on barriers to market entry.
E-commerce demolishes many existing market barriers, including geographic and
market separation barriers (e.g., products and services available in one
country but not in another, for a variety of reasons), custom and practice
barriers (e.g., products and services sold only through intermediaries, such as
travel agents, etc.), and business scale barriers (e.g., the ease with which
small e-commerce start-ups can quickly become major players in an established
market, such as Amazon.com in book-selling).
- The way it enables increased efficiency and effectiveness within
existing business models. The speaker gave several examples of UK
companies that were able to reduce development costs and shorten product
development cycles by means of e-commerce links to their suppliers. In the
business-to-consumer area, he gave additional examples of U.S. companies that
improved productivity, reduced cost, and increased customer satisfaction by
means of e-commerce.
- Most importantly, the way it enables transformation of existing
business models. [7] E-commerce is
transforming business, by reducing transaction costs (resulting in improved
efficiencies and new business opportunities), breaking down geographical
barriers (yet with a premium on "clusters" of tacit knowledge), and
accelerating rates of change.
Besides its impact on business, E-commerce is also affecting governments and
people in fundamental ways. It affects government by increasing
efficiency and changing interactions with the outside world, affecting the
speed and availability of information, and challenging existing regulatory
frameworks. It affects people by reducing prices, creating new products
and services and increasing choice, changing working methods, and, on the
negative side, by creating possibilities of social exclusion.
Stages in E-Commerce Adoption: Offshore Out-Sourcing versus
Clusters
According to the speaker, stage one of e-commerce adoption usually
focuses on cost reduction via increased efficiencies and effectiveness within
existing business models. This often tends to attract companies offshore, to
areas with:
- Lower labor costs, yet a high standard of education.
- Good (local) infrastructure with global connectivity,
- Tax breaks for exports.
This ignores the impact of stage two of e-commerce, which involves
revolutionary change in the business model. This requires skills in innovation
and business change that are likely to be incompatible with offshore
out-sourcing. Such skills are more likely to be found in "clusters":
geographic concentrations of interconnected companies and institutions in a
particular field.[8]
According to the speaker, the balance between these two forces, offshore
out-sourcing and clusters, will have a crucial impact on European economies,
particularly for immaterial products or services.
The UK Vision Regarding E-Commerce
As described by the speaker, the UK government has the following vision for
where it wants the UK to be with regard to e-commerce in 2002:
For individuals:
- A higher percentage of people in the UK will have access to e-commerce
networks from home than in any other G7 country;
- The total cost of Internet access will be lower in the UK than in any
other G7 country;
- A higher percentage of the population will use multi-function
smartcards than in any other G7 country.
For business:
- A higher percentage of business-to-business and business-to-consumer
transactions will be carried out on e-commerce networks than in any other G7
country.
For Government:
- A higher percentage of total government services may be transacted
through E-commerce networks than in any other G7 country.
The UK government has identified three pillars on which the achievement
of this vision must be based:
- Understanding: The need to create awareness of opportunities
and threats posed by e-commerce, overcoming uncertainty and imperfect
information about electronic markets, and breaking down skill barriers.
- Access: Giving business and individuals the ability to
interact, thereby accelerating the achievement of critical mass in electronic
markets.
- Trust: Giving consumers (business and individual) confidence in
electronic markets and ensuring that they are willing to exploit the
opportunities and react to the threats.
The UK government has identified a number of barriers to achieving this vision
in 2002, including: an environment in the UK insufficiently competitive,
entrepreneurial, and innovative to force e-commerce adoption throughout
industry; inadequate coordination and focus of e-commerce initiatives across
government; lack of internationally agreed-upon fiscal and regulatory
frameworks for e-commerce; and inadequate monitoring of e-commerce outcomes.
According to the speaker, the UK government has agreed on a set of actions to
overcome these barriers, strengthen the three pillars, and attain the vision.[9]
New Business Models Driven by the Information Revolution
The second speaker discussed new models for the internal organization and
functioning of business enterprises, and for their external interactions with
customers, suppliers, and competitors.
He began by noting that skepticism exists in some quarters that things are
really different.[10] After all, businesses
have been bombarded by waves of "fads" over the decades. Could the information
revolution be just another fad?
In his view, emerging evidence suggests that things are indeed different. The
present is a time of great experimentation in the business world, with lots of
data emerging. It represents an unique opportunity for testing old and new
models and theories.
The Changing Environment for Business
Today, the global IT grid, with "free" communications, total connectivity,
universal digitization, pervasive influence, and vast data generation, is a
driver of fundamental change in the business world. These changes include:
- Globalization, of more and more business and financial activities.
- Changes in scale, with the new information technology allowing a
company to focus on one person, or on one billion people.
- Non-linear and positive-feedback effects, frequently including a large
"first mover" advantage.
- Accelerating rates of change, with speed and time becoming critical in
business ventures.
- Emerging new social structures, in which businesses much exist and
function.
- Loss of conventional reference frameworks.
These changes are leading to a "new era economics," characterized by a
knowledge economy, non-linear effects, an unpredictable future, a redefinition
of terms, time/distance changes, and much greater transparency (in pricing and
other aspects of business).
As a result of all of this, many fundamental tenets of business are being
questioned. Since most businesses today are not externally focussed -- in the
speaker's view -- making sense of these changes becomes a serious problem.
The New Business Model
This changing environment is leading to a new business model, with the
following major elements:
- Centrality of the customer; the dominant factor in business
today, influencing everything.[11]
- A non-linear world defining business processes; business
capabilities must explicitly address this.
- Competition's fundamental role, forcing continuing adaptation
and change.
- A services/capabilities approach to developing everything.
- Globalization.
- Technology and business integrated into a unified approach.
- A continuum of individual/enterprise/community/NGOs/government/
nations; businesses must handle this continuum.
- Redefined basic functions of business.
The speaker gave a number of examples of the Rules in this new business
model, including:
- Businesses must be externally driven.
- Businesses must adapt, not optimize.
- Businesses explicitly manage risk.
- Businesses must operate in real time.[12]
- Business must be non-linear in their capabilities.
- Businesses must have customer-based loops.[13]
- Businesses cannot plan anymore.[14]
- Businesses must use new paradigms for product, service, delivery,
support, and pricing.
- Businesses must regard competition as fundamental to their development
and progress.
- Businesses must resolve and exploit the customer paradox (i.e., the
ability to focus on one and millions, at the same time).
- Businesses must use true innovation as the basis for breaking the
dominance of increasing returns (i.e., positive feedback).[15]
- Businesses must discover the key shaping forces for
self-organization.
- Businesses must change the connectivity from the supply chain to the
customer.[16]
Some Key Examples of Change
The speaker gave some key examples of change occurring as a result of this new
business model and its new rules:
- A revolution is in process in pricing, with prices becoming much more
dynamic, often determined in auctions, frequently personalized to target
individual customers, and much more transparent.
- Information from the real world, rather than the internal, company
world, increasingly drives business. This leads to many issues and problems
(e.g., privacy, control, transparency, authenticity, making sense of all the
information, etc.).
- Business is increasingly coupled to the real-time world. The worldwide
financial community is a good example of this; all of its systems are tuned to
the real-time world.
- New forms of marketing are shaping self-organization of businesses.
- The customer is becoming the co-producer of the business.[17]
Based on all of the above, the speaker believes that things are indeed
different; lots of evidence suggests that new things are taking place in the
economy, with science and technology beginning to dominate business.
Businesses cannot afford to wait; they must participate now. Some outlines are
already in place to show them the way (e.g. the rules listed above).
These changes look profound and disturbing to some (in the business world and
elsewhere), but the business community and the broader society are beginning to
adapt. All of this leads, among other things, to a new and interesting stress
between the individual and government.
The speaker concluded by saying that businesses changed dramatically during the
1980s and 1990s, but he believes that even more profound change is in prospect.
The "new era ethos" is "to participate and experience business reality."
The Discussion
In the general discussion that followed these remarks, one participant cited
the varying structures of capital markets in different nations as an important
differential determinant of the future course of the information revolution.
According to this participant, the availability of funding for new IT
businesses and concepts and the manner of the funding process (i.e., the
vagaries of getting funding, listings, capital, acquisitions, etc.) directly
impact the growth and development of new IT industries in any given region.
She views this as critical because, in her words, new Internet
concepts/businesses are anti-establishment by their very nature -- they upset
and challenge the old business models, monopolies and ways of doing things --
and yet money is a very establishment thing in most countries. She believes
that the free and open flow of capital, the existence of seed and venture
capital, and vibrant over-the-counter markets like NASDAQ (which give venture
capitalists and start-up employees an exit market) are critical enabling
factors for the growth and proliferation of IT.
The ability of start-ups to get such funding differs greatly from one nation to
another. For example, she cited Taiwan as a nation that aggressively uses
equity financing for start-ups.[18] Hong Kong
and Singapore, on the other hand, lack a strong equity culture and a secondary
market, and rely much more heavily on debt financing. But debt financing
requires a track record and punishes failure -- both of which are detrimental
to start-ups.
In this participant's view, equity participation for most/all members of the
staff of an IT start-up (the current Silicon Valley model) facilitates the
attraction of top people.[19] This is
something else you lose with debt financing.
Returning to the new business model described by the second speaker, another
participant noted that the ability to have real-time, 24-hour business
information (e.g., "closing the books" once a day) will be transforming for
businesses. They will have much better information on which to base decisions
(as opposed, for example, to the information available from a quarterly closing
of the books).
This participant also noted the large data sets (of customer information, etc.)
becoming available because of IT. He stated that some businesses have been
able to extract "amazing" business-relevant value from these data sets.
Finally, another participant noted that various studies exist of "national
innovation systems." He suggested that these studies should have some
relevance to the current discussion.[20]
[6] See Cabinet Office (1999) for a detailed
discussion of the UK e-commerce vision and program.
[7] The second speaker addressed this in more
detail.
[8] See Porter (1998) for a discussion of such
"clusters."
[9] As indicated earlier, Cabinet Office (1999)
discusses all aspects of this UK e-commerce program.
[10] The speaker characterized these skeptics as
"economists," as distinguished from "financial journalists and investment
advisors," who (apparently) in his view are not skeptics.
[11] According to the speaker, companies are
valued at $200 to $3000 per customer today. This is the main current metric
for company valuation.
[12] As example of this rule, the speaker
mentioned a large, multinational financial services company which now closes
its books every day, rather than once a quarter, as it used to do.
[13] As an example of this rule, the speaker
mentioned Microsoft, which shipped out about one million copies of Windows 2000
for beta test and debugging; the customer thereby becoming an integral part of
the Microsoft business model.
[14] In the sense of detailed, long-term
strategic plans that have any enduring utility. As an example of this, the
same multinational financial services company mentioned previously no longer
develops a five-year strategic plan or annual budgets.
[15] According to the speaker, much of company
valuation these days is based on the concept of increasing returns of scale,
and bets on who will dominate. (But many will fail.)
[16] Walmart and Amazon.com are two well known
examples of companies that have done this.
[17] Microsoft's involvement of its customers
in the beta testing of its software, mentioned above, is an example of this.
[18] According to this participant, in this
regard Taiwan is very similar to Silicon Valley.
[19] In Silicon Valley today, this use of
equity shares in lieu of salary, etc. extends well beyond the staffs of the
start-ups themselves. Many of the accounting and law firms providing services
to start-ups are accepting equity shares in lieu of fees.
[20] See Nelson (1993) for a discussion of one
such study of national innovation systems.
Contents
Previous Chapter
Next Chapter