2005 RAND Annual Report
Credibility Amidst Controversy
We would be remiss in our duties if we avoided controversial issues. We would be equally remiss if we addressed those issues in ways that consistently favored one ideology or partisan faction over another. We are at our best when we deliver objective information that offers all political camps a common point of departure from which they can, if they choose, work toward mutually beneficial solutions.
Many of our finest accomplishments in 2005 resulted from our ability to address controversial questions and yet retain our credibility amidst controversy.
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web-Only
- Pages: 60
- Document Number: CP-1 (2005)
- Year: 2006
- Series: Corporate Publications
This report is part of the RAND Corporation corporate publication series. Corporate publications are program or department brochures, newsletters, pamphlets, and miscellaneous information about the RAND Corporation or RAND's business units. Some corporate publications are published in the AR series as Annual Reports or as Administrative Reports. Administrative Reports are often required by the client or sponsor and provide a status report on work resulting from a contract.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.