Appropriateness of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Comparison of American and Swiss Criteria

Published In: International Journal for Quality In Health Care, v. 9, no. 2, 1997, p. 87-92

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1997

by John Paul Vader, Bernard Burnand, Florian Froehlich, Karine Dupriez, Tania Larequi-Lauber, Isabelle Pache, Robert W. Dubois, Jean-Jacques Gonvers, Robert H. Brook

Read More

Access further information on this document at intqhc.oxfordjournals.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Compares the development of appropriateness criteria for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in the United States and in Switzerland. It concludes that separate expert panels in different countries, using a standardized methodology, produce similar criteria for appropriateness of medical procedures, and indicated that given the resources being invested throughout the world in developing criteria and guidelines, international collaboration for seeking optimal use of limited health care resources should be intensified. In particular, 78% of compatible indications were assigned to identical categories of appropriateness by both the U.S. and Swiss panels, which produced a kappa of 0.76--a high level of agreement between the Swiss and American panels--demonstrating that such indications can be used across countries to measure appropriateness of medical care.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.