Systematic Reviews for Evidence-Based Management

How to Find Them and What to Do with Them

Published in: American Journal of Managed Care, v. 10, no. 11, pt. 1, Nov. 2004, p. 806-812

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2004

by Kitty S. Chan, Sally C. Morton, Paul G. Shekelle

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.ajmc.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE: To identify strategies for retrieval and evaluation of systematic reviews from a management perspective. SUDY DESIGN: Review of available literature and resources on systematic reviews. METHODS: From published literature on evidence-based medicine and systematic review, the authors identified resources and adapted retrieval and evaluation strategies for healthcare managers. A published systematic review then was assessed for quality and relevance to management decisions. RESULTS: Systematic reviews relevant to the organization and delivery of care are available. Criteria for evaluating the relevance and quality of systematic reviews on clinical topics may be adapted for systematic reviews on organizational topics. However, even a systematic review that focuses on an organizational topic can lack important information on costs and study setting. CONCLUSIONS: Greater familiarity with the retrieval and evaluation of systematic reviews can help managers use these sources effectively and encourage the development of evidence-based management.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.