The Cost Effectiveness of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

Results from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT)-II

Published in: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, v. 47, no. 11, June 2006, p. 2310-2318

Posted on RAND.org on December 31, 2005

by Jack Zwanziger, W. Jackson Hall, Andrew W. Dick, Hongwei Zhao, Alvin I. Mushlin, Rebecca Marron Hahn, Hongkun Wang, Mark L. Andrews, Cathleen Mooney, Hongyue Wang, Arthur J. Moss

Read More

Access further information on this document at content.onlinejacc.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate the cost implications of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), using utilization, cost, and survival data from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT)-II. BACKGROUND: This trial showed that prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator reduces the rate of mortality in patients who experienced a previous myocardial infarction and low left ventricular ejection fraction. Given the size of the eligible population, the cost effectiveness of the ICD has substantial implications. METHODS: Our research comprises the cost-effectiveness component of the randomized controlled trial, MADIT-II, based on utilization, cost, and survival information from 1,095 U.S. patients who were assigned randomly to receive an ICD or conventional medical care. Utilization data were converted to costs using a variety of national and hospital-specific data. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (iCER) was calculated as the difference in discounted costs divided by the difference in discounted life expectancy within 3.5 years. Secondary analyses included projections of survival (using three alternative assumptions), corresponding cost assumptions, and the resulting cost-effectiveness ratios until 12 years after randomization. RESULTS: During the 3.5-year period of the study, the average survival gain for the defibrillator arm was 0.167 years (2 months), the additional costs were $39,200, and the iCER was $235,000 per year-of-life saved. In three alternative projections to 12 years, this ratio ranged from $78,600 to $114,000. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated cost per life-year saved by the ICD in the MADIT-II study is relatively high at 3.5 years but is projected to be substantially lower over the course of longer time horizons.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.