Comparison of Data Quality for Reports and Ratings of Ambulatory Care By African American and White Medicare Managed Care Enrollees

Cover: Comparison of Data Quality for Reports and Ratings of Ambulatory Care By African American and White Medicare Managed Care Enrollees

Published in: Journal of Aging and Health, v. 18, no. 5, Oct. 1, 2006, p. 707-721

OBJECTIVE: Compare missing data and reliability of health care evaluations between African Americans and Whites in Medicare managed care health plans. METHOD: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) 3.0 health plan survey data collected from 109,980 Medicare managed care enrollees (101,189 Whites, 8,791 African Americans) in 321 plans. Participants self-administered the survey and four single-item global ratings of care. RESULTS: Missing data rates were significantly higher for African Americans than Whites on all CAHPS items (p < .0001). Internal consistency reliability estimates for the CAHPS scales did not differ significantly between African Americans and Whites, but plan-level reliability estimates for the scales and global rating items were significantly lower for African Americans than Whites. DISCUSSION: Higher missing data rates and lower plan-level reliability estimates for African American Medicare managed care enrollees suggest caution in making race/ethnicity comparisons. Future efforts are needed to enhance the quality of data collected from older African Americans.

Document Details

  • Publisher: SAGE Publications
  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Pages: 15
  • Document Number: EP-200610-03
  • Year: 2006
  • Series: External Publications

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.