Body Mass Index Is Increasing Faster Among Taller Persons
Published In: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, v. 87, no. 2, Feb. 2008, p. 445-448
BACKGROUND: During the past 40 y, there has been a trend toward more eating away from home, increased food availability, the opportunity to order extra-large portion sizes, and general weight gain. OBJECTIVE: Because shorter people need fewer calories than taller people to maintain their weight, the author's goal was to determine whether the body mass index (BMI)-height relation has changed over time. DESIGN: Data are from 3581 nonpregnant women and 3091 men examined in the 1959-1962 National Health Examination Survey and 4651 nonpregnant women and 4691 men examined in the 2001-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The authors tested whether the relation between BMI and height has changed for men and women, after adjustment for other demographic changes. RESULTS: In the past, on average, shorter American men and women had significantly higher BMIs than taller people. However, taller people have been increasing their BMI during the past 40 y at a faster rate than shorter people. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents that the obesity epidemic has changed the height-BMI relation. The data cannot identify causal pathways, and there are numerous explanations. A plausible hypothesis is that changes in the food environment may have eliminated constraints on weight gain for taller people that existed in a more calorie-constrained environment.
- Copyright: American Society for Clinical Nutrition
- Availability: Non-RAND
- Pages: 4
- Document Number: EP-200802-11
- Year: 2008
- Series: External Publications
This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.