Assessing the Appropriateness of Care--Its Time Has Come

Published in: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association, v. 302, no. 9, Sep. 2009, p. 997-998

Posted on RAND.org on December 31, 2008

by Robert H. Brook

Read More

Access further information on this document at jama.jamanetwork.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Health care reform in the United States is likely to fail without fundamental changes in the practice of medicine. What can be done within a year to substantially increase the likelihood that Americans receive appropriate, humane, affordable care? A starting point is to draw on more than 2 decades of empirical research based on the RAND/University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Method (RUAM) to develop explicit criteria for determining the appropriateness of care. Physicians and patients can use the results from applying this method to make better informed decisions about expensive, elective procedures or diagnostic tests, and the process of developing the criteria will strengthen the clinical evidence base. The RUAM was developed more than 20 years ago in an effort to understand why quality of care in the United States, and in other developed countries, varied substantially.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.