Citizen Preparedness for Disasters
Are Current Assumptions Valid?
Published in: Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, v. 6, no. 2, June 2012, p. 170-173
U.S. government programs and communications regarding citizen preparedness for disasters rest on several untested, and therefore unverified, assumptions. We explore the assumptions related to citizen preparedness promotion and argue that in spite of extensive messaging about the importance of citizen preparedness and countless household surveys purporting to track the preparedness activities of individuals and households, the role individual Americans are being asked to play is largely based on conventional wisdom. Recommendations for conceptualizing and measuring citizen preparedness are discussed.
- Why are many Americans ignoring public health messages to prepare for disasters?
- How can citizen preparedness be promoted?
- The role individual Americans are being asked to play in preparedness is largely based on conventional wisdom.
- Evidence and measurement, combined with a critical examination of long-held assumptions, offer the surest path to preparedness.
- actual data to inform recommendations for citizen preparedness
- meaningful, consistent measures to monitor preparedness on an ongoing basis
- data about which aspects of bystander response are most helpful and which may be counterproductive.
- Copyright: American Medical Association
- Availability: Non-RAND
- Pages: 4
- Document Number: EP-201200-137
- Year: 2012
- Series: External Publications
This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.