Effectiveness of Cognitive Tutor Algebra I at Scale

Published in: Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, v. 36, no. 2, June 2014, p. 127 - 144

Posted on RAND.org on June 01, 2014

by John F. Pane, Beth Ann Griffin, Daniel F. McCaffrey, Rita Karam

Read More

Access further information on this document at Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This article examines the effectiveness of a technology-based algebra curriculum in a wide variety of middle schools and high schools in seven states. Participating schools were matched into similar pairs and randomly assigned to either continue with the current algebra curriculum for 2 years or to adopt Cognitive Tutor Algebra I (CTAI), which uses a personalized, mastery-learning, blended-learning approach. Schools assigned to implement CTAI did so under conditions similar to schools that independently adopt it. Analysis of posttest outcomes on an algebra proficiency exam finds no effects in the first year of implementation, but finds evidence in support of positive effects in the second year. The estimated effect is statistically significant for high schools but not for middle schools; in both cases, the magnitude is sufficient to improve the median student's performance by approximately eight percentile points.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.