Cover: New Support for the Big Sort Hypothesis

New Support for the Big Sort Hypothesis

An Assessment of Partisan Geographic Sorting in California, 1992-2010

Published In: PS: Political Science and Politics, v. 46, no. 4, Oct. 2013, p. 768-773

by Jesse Sussell

Read More

Access further information on this document at Cambridge University Press

This study was published in a peer-reviewed scholarly journal. The full text of the study can be found at the link above.

Abstract

This article empirically examines the "Big Sort hypothesis"—the notion that, in recent years, liberal and conservative Americans have become increasingly spatially isolated from one another. Using block group-, tract-, and county-level party registration data and presidential election returns, I construct two formal indices of segregation for 1992–2010 in California and evaluate those indices for evidence of growth in the segregation of Californians along ideological lines. Evidence of rising geographic segregation between Democrats and Republicans for measures generated from both party registration and presidential vote data is found. This growth is statistically significant for 10 of the 12 segregation measures analyzed. In addition, many of the increases are practically significant, with estimates of growth in segregation during the observation period ranging from 2% to 23%.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.