Cover: Measuring Agreement Between Egos and Alters

Measuring Agreement Between Egos and Alters

Understanding Informant Accuracy in Personal Network Studies

Published in: Field Methods, v. 26, no. 2, May 2014, p. 126-140

by Harold D. Green, Matthew Hoover, Glenn Wagner, Gery W. Ryan, Eric Ssegujja

Read More

Access further information on this document at Field Methods

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Abstract

In personal network studies, respondents (egos) are asked to report information about members of their personal network (alters); egos respond based on their perceptions. Previous studies of informant accuracy present a varied picture: Some find egos' reporting on their relationships with alters to be accurate; others do not. In our study of people living with HIV/AIDS in Uganda, egos were asked to invite up to four alters named during their interview to answer questions about their relationship with ego. Using Gower's general coefficient of similarity, we calculated a measure of accuracy both by variable and by alter. Our analysis by variable tends to confirm informant accuracy research, while our analysis by alter adds to the literature by identifying how accurate a particular ego is when discussing an alter and what characteristics might be associated with accuracy or inaccuracy.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.