Quality-of-care Indicators for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Development of an Infrastructure for Quality Assessment

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal, v. 24, no. 12, Dec. 2013, p. 2039-2047

Posted on RAND.org on December 01, 2013

by Jennifer T. Anger, Victoria C S Scott, Krista Kiyosaki, Aqsa A. Khan, Claudia Sevilla, Sarah Connor, Carol P. Roth, Mark Litwin, Neil S. Wenger, Paul G. Shekelle

Read More

Access further information on this document at International Urogynecology Journal

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: A paucity of data exists addressing the quality of care provided to women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). We sought to develop a means of measuring this quality through the development of quality-of-care indicators (QIs). METHODS: QIs were modeled after those previously described in the Assessing the Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE) project. The indicators were then presented to a panel of nine experts. Using the RAND Appropriateness Method, we analyzed each indicator's preliminary rankings. A forum was then held in which each indicator was thoroughly discussed by the panelists as a group, after which panelists individually re-rated the indicators. QIs with median scores of at least 7 were considered valid. RESULTS: QIs were developed that addressed screening, diagnosis, work-up, and both nonsurgical and surgical management. Areas of controversy included whether screening should be performed to identify prolapse, whether pessary users should undergo a vaginal examination by a health professional every 6 months versus annually, and whether a colpocleisis should be offered to older women planning to undergo surgery for POP. Fourteen out of 21 potential indicators were rated as valid for pelvic organ prolapse (median score ≥7). CONCLUSION: We developed and rated 14 potential quality indicators for the care of women with POP. Once these QIs are tested for feasibility they can be used on a larger scale to measure and compare the care provided to women with prolapse in different clinical settings.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.