Psychological and Psychosocial Consequences of Combat and Deployment with Special Emphasis on the Gulf War
Research in the neurosciences has demonstrated that the boundary between the external world (its events, pressures, concerns and stress) and the brain and body has been broken. The concept of anything being all in the mind is scientifically and intellectually dead. While some data remain ambiguous and direct causal effect cannot be given to stress per se, the overall patterns of research findings demonstrate that stress is a contributing factor to many illnesses, including somatic and psychological symptoms. Therefore, very real consequences attend those who experience prolonged subacute chronic stress, which characterized in the Gulf deployment, combat, and return home. It is feasible that the effects of these stresses made some soldiers more vulnerable to environmental pathogens, both in the theater and at home, than they would otherwise have been. The symptoms of such insults, nested in sociocultural beliefs about illness and the Gulf, might well have amplified deleterious somatic consequences. Like many illnesses, those pertaining to service in the Gulf have been culturally shaped. An illness narrative describes the causes of the illness as perceived by the patient and is most often constructed out of the assertions, metaphors, folklore, causal attributions, and adduced causes common in the patient’s culture. Other agents of a presumed authorities, the Internet, and support and self-help groups. Such illness narratives can become an important factor in shaping both the nature and interpretation of symptoms by the patient. A cogent, widespread, and widely shared illness narrative is certainly a characteristic development of Gulf War illness. The threads of combat and deployment stress and the side spectrum of possible responses, as demonstrated throughout history, weaves into the matrix of possible illness causation. It is also possible that a subset of the population is (in some ways, not yet understood) vulnerable and predisposed to injurious responses to the multiple stressors experienced in deployment and combat. This book argues that, to be most helpful to veterans, we must deal with this issue of complexity and not simply focus on a hypothecated or hoped for singular cause of Gulf War illness.
-
Download Individual Chapters Below
Note: Many electronic documents posted prior to 2003 are available as chapter PDFs or HTML files linked from the Contents.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Format: Paperback
- Pages: 214
- List Price: $45.00
- Price: $36.00
- ISBN/EAN: 0-8330-2685-2
- Document Number: MR-1018/11-OSD
- Year: 2001
- Series: Monograph Reports
Contents
Preface PDF
Tables PDF
Foreword PDF
Summary PDF
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgments PDF
Chapter One
Introduction PDF
Chapter Two
Historical Overview: Psychological Consequences of Battle Stress PDF
Chapter Three
Modern War: The American Civil War PDF
Chapter Four
Conceptual and Theoretical Medical Developments in the 19th and Early 20th Centuries PDF
Chapter Five
World War I PDF
Chapter Six
1919-1941: The Interwar Years PDF
Chapter Seven
World War II PDF
Chapter Eight
Post-World War II Conceptual Developments PDF
Chapter Nine
Vietnam PDF
Chapter Ten
The Gulf War: Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm PDF
Chapter Eleven
Return from the Persian Gulf and Its Consequences PDF
Chapter Twelve
Conclusions PDF
Bibliography PDF
This research was sponsored by the RAND National Security Research Division and RAND Health.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.


