Improving the Army Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution System (PPBES)
The Planning Phase
This report documents an examination of the planning phase of the Army Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution System, to determine the extent to which the Army's reengineering of planning and programming was successful and to suggest improvements.
Download eBook for Free
|PDF file||2.5 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Print Format: Paperback
- Paperback Pages: 86
- List Price: $12.00
- Paperback Price: $9.60
- Paperback ISBN/EAN: 0-8330-2818-9
- Document Number: MR-1133-A
- Year: 2000
- Series: Monograph Reports
The Context of TAP
Reengineering Army Programming
Analysis of TAP 00-15: What Was Accomplished
Revising TAP 02-17
Conclusions and Recommendations For TAP 02-17
Linkages Among JV2010, AV2010, and ASPG
Translating Guidance from the ASPG to TAP
Mission Area Tables
Strawman Operational Objectives
Strawman Operational Capabilities
Hierarchy of Mission Areas, Objectives, Capabilities
This research was conducted within RAND's Arroyo Center.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.