Dying to Know: Public Release of Information about Quality of Health Care
Public disclosure of the comparative performance of health care providers is seen as one mechanism for improving quality of care and controlling health care costs. This report, the result of a collaboration between the Nuffield Trust in London and RAND, assesses the U.S. experience with publicly releasing health care performance data and offers guidelines for establishing public disclosure policy in the United Kingdom. Becausethe United States leads the world in reporting clinical information by hospital and by physician name, this report will be of interest to any country considering public release of performance data. Principal findings: Despite a rapidly expanding report card industry, U.S. physicians are skeptical about report cards, and consumers and purchasers rarely use them.Hospitals may respond to performance data with internal changes, especially in a competitive environment. Publishing comparative mortality data seems to improve outcomes, but the mechanism by which this happens is unclear. Key recommendations: Public disclosure should be viewed as an evolutionary process, becoming more sophisticatedand comprehensive over time. Disclosure should be a tool to support all quality initiatives in the U.K. National Health Service. Provider organizations should be a key audience for performance information. Health professionals should be fully involved in the publicdisclosure process. Both process and outcome measures of quality should be published. Public disclosure should be accompanied by possible explanations for the variations reported.
- Full Document (pdf format) (File size 0.3 MB)
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.
-
Download Individual Chapters Below
Note: Many electronic documents posted prior to 2003 are available as chapter PDFs or HTML files linked from the Contents.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Format: Paperback
- Pages: 131
- List Price: $25.00
- Price: $20.00
- ISBN/EAN: 0-8330-2891-X
- Document Number: MR-1255-NT
- Year: 2000
- Series: Monograph Reports
Contents
Foreword PDF
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgments PDF
Summary
Executive Summary PDF
Abbreviations PDF
Chapter One
Introduction PDF
Chapter Two
Methodology PDF
Chapter Three
Public Disclosure in the Context of Health Care Systems PDF
Chapter Four
The Purpose of Public Release of Performance Data PDF
Chapter Five
Overview of Publicly Available Performance Data in the United States PDF
Chapter Six
Evaluation of the Impact of Public Data PDF
Chapter Seven
Discussion: Policy Issues for the United Kingdom PDF
Chapter Eight
Recommendations PDF
References PDF
Chapter 1
Frequency of Conditions/Procedures Studied in Report Cards PDF
Chapter 2
Evidence Tables PDF
Chapter 3
Conceptual Model of Public Disclosure PDF
Chapter 4
Summary of Reporting Systems That Have Been Subject to Evaluation PDF
Chapter 5
U.S. Diagnosis Related Group Frequency Data PDF
Chapter 6
U.K. Common Causes of Hospital Bed Occupancy PDF
Chapter 7
Illustrative Examples of Performance Indicators in the U.K. PDF
The study was conducted within RAND Health.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.


