Measuring General Practice

A Demonstration Project to Develop and Test a Set of Primary Care Clinical Quality Indicators

by Martin Marshall, Martin Roland, Stephen M. Campbell, Susan Guthrie, David Reeves, Robert H. Brook, Elizabeth A. McGlynn, Paul G. Shekelle

Download

Download eBook for Free

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.5 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.

Summary Only

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback69 pages $25.00 $20.00 20% Web Discount

The development and use of objective measures of the processes and outcomes of health care is fundamental to improving any health care system. Valid and reliable measures of quality serve to promote greater accountability of health professionals and organizations; act as a catalyst for quality improvement, as a vehicle for greater public and patient involvement; and provide an opportunity for patients and purchasers to exercise choice. For these reasons, general practice is starting to rise to the challenge to develop measures that reflect the values of the doctors and nurses working in primary care. This report summarizes a project that aimed to develop and test a comprehensive set of clinical quality indicators for use in British general practice. The study was commissioned by the Nuffield Trust with the aim of transferring expertise and specific measurement technologies from the United States to the UK. The project was conducted as a partnership between the National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, UK, and The RAND Corporation, RAND Health, Santa Monica, California, USA. Expert panels rated 168 indicators for 19 targeted conditions, often seen in primary care practice, as valid measures of quality. The authors found that poor quality of data in general practice records, both in terms of its availability and accessibility, represents a significant obstacle to quality assessment in primary care. They also found that quality indicators, such as those developed in this project, have an important role to play in professionally led improvement, performance management, and user involvement. However, such a disease-focused approach to measuring quality in general practice will inevitably omit many important aspects of care, such as issues relating to access and interpersonal care. In addition, the tension between professionally led quality improvement and managerially led quality assessment needs to be recognized and addressed.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    The Policy Context

  • Chapter Two

    Quality Indicators for Primary Care: An Overview

  • Chapter Three

    Aims and Objectives of the Project

  • Chapter Four

    Methods

  • Chapter Five

    Results

  • Chapter Six

    Implications for Policy and Practice

Research conducted by

This report has been commissioned as part of a collaboration between the Nuffield Trust, London and RAND Health, Santa Monica, California. The project on which the report is based was conducted in partnership with the National Primary Care Research and Development Centre (NPCRDC), based at the University of Manchester, UK.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.