The Cost of School-Based Educational Technology Programs
Brent Keltner, Randy L. Ross
Copyright © 1995 RAND
PrefaceThis study offers information on the range of resources and inputs that go into a school-based technology program. Its primary goal is to provide a framework for helping educators and policymakers structure their thinking about the costs related to using technology in delivering education. The study does not try to assess the effectiveness of educational technology programs.
The information is also intended as an input for further analyses. The cost information generated in the study is a first step in structuring a research agenda to understand the more difficult question of cost-effectiveness.
This report is part of a study by the RAND Critical Technologies Institute (CTI) for the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and the Office of Technology Policy within the U.S. Department of Education. The Critical Technologies Institute was created in 1991 by an act of Congress. It is a federally funded research and development center (FFRDC) within RAND. CTI's mission is to
- provide analytical support to the Executive Office of the President of the United States;
- help decisionmakers understand the likely consequences of their decisions and choose among alternative policies; and
- improve understanding in both the public and private sectors of the ways in which technological efforts can better serve national objectives.
Director, Critical Technologies Institute
2100 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037-1270
SummaryWith computer and information technology taking on increasing importance in the American workplace and in American society, educators and policymakers are redoubling their efforts to bring technology into the nation's classrooms. Students will be better prepared for the transition from an industrial to an information age, these individuals believe, if they have exposure and access to technology during their K-12 school years. To successfully implement educational technology programs, decisionmakers need information in three areas: the curricular applications of information technology, the organizational changes required by technology, and the costs of technology programs. Research has been done in the first two areas, but research regarding costs is sparse.
This report helps to fill the gap in research on the costs of educational technology programs in K-12 schools. Using in-depth case studies of eight schools that use technology extensively to facilitate instruction, the study generates comprehensive estimates of what it costs a school to set up a technology program. No attempt was made to assess the effectiveness of the technology programs we investigated. The study's goal was limited to understanding the costs and main causes of cost variation in school-based technology programs. By educational technology programs, we mean the use of computer, network, and multimedia technology to improve classroom-based instruction. Other technologies such as radios, telephones, or copy machines were not included in our analysis. We also tried to separate out, where possible, the costs of technology used for purely administrative purposes.
To develop a comprehensive cost estimate at each site, we gathered information on all technology-related expenditures in six categories -- hardware, software, personnel, staff development, infrastructural changes, and materials. Then we amortized expenditures on hardware, software, and initial staff development over a five-year period, and infrastructure costs over a ten-year period. We treated the costs of personnel, materials, and ongoing staff development as annual expenses.
Using this approach, we estimated the cost of educational technology programs at the eight schools to range from a low of $142 per student per year to a high of $490 per student per year. Our analysis suggests that the two most significant determinants of this cost variation are differences in the number of additional personnel per student used to support the technology program and differences in the ratio of computers to students at each site. These two factors account for between 50%-60% of total technology expenditures at the eight schools.
Figure S.1 shows how differences in computer densities and additional personnel cause schools to cluster at different levels of cost per pupil. The three low-cost models have relatively few computers and make limited use of additional personnel. Two of the four high-cost models have very high computer densities, but low levels of personnel support. The other two high-cost models have high computer densities and very high levels of personnel support. The eighth and final education technology model has moderate-to-high levels of both computers and additional personnel.
Educators and policymakers who are considering investing in educational technology can benefit from this study. The cost information contained in the text makes it easier for schools to assess the feasibility of implementing their educational technology goals. The technology models outlined in the text provide a quick and easy baseline to develop cost estimates. Federal, state, and school district coordinators of educational technology programs can use the results of the study to evaluate the costs of alternative scale-up scenarios. Public and private parties interested in funding educational programs can use the information in the text to assess the reasonableness of cost estimates provided by schools and districts.
Ultimately, policymakers should seek to understand the relative cost-effectiveness of alternative education technology models. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the eight models that formed the basis for the cost analysis was beyond the scope of this study. However, such evaluations should be included in education's research agenda.
ContentsChapter One: Introduction: The Need for Data on Costs
Chapter Two: Approach to Estimating Costs
Selection of Technology LeadersChapter Three: The Cost of Eight School-Based Technology Programs
The Cost Model
Corona Elementary SchoolChapter Four: Cost Comparisons Across Schools
East Bakersfield High
Elizabeth St. Learning Center
Taylorsville Elementary School
Blackstock Junior High School
The Accelerated Learning Laboratory
Northbrook Middle School
Christopher Columbus Middle School
Explaining Variation in CostChapter Five: Concluding Remarks
Major Components of Cost
RAND's Home Page