Download

Download eBook for Free

Full Document

Includes all revisions.

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.7 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.

Summary Only

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.

Appendix Materials

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.

Errata

Posted 09-26-2011.

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback312 pages $34.50 $27.60 20% Web Discount

WINNER — 2012 Outstanding Policy Report (Short Report)

Division L, American Educational Research Association (AERA)

Abstract

In the 2007–2008 school year, the New York City Department of Education and the United Federation of Teachers jointly implemented the Schoolwide Performance Bonus Program in a random sample of the city's high-needs public schools. The program lasted for three school years, and its broad objective was to improve student performance through school-based financial incentives. The question, of course, was whether it was doing so. To examine its implementation and effects, the department tasked a RAND Corporation-led partnership with the National Center on Performance Incentives at Vanderbilt University to conduct a two-year study of the program that would offer an independent assessment. This report describes the results of our analyses for all three years of the program, from 2007–2008 through 2009–2010. This work built on past research and was guided by a theory of action articulated by program leaders. Researchers examined student test scores; teacher, school staff, and administrator surveys; and interviews with administrators, staff members, program sponsors, and union and district officials. The researchers found that the program did not, by itself, improve student achievement, perhaps in part because conditions needed to motivate staff were not achieved (e.g., understanding, buy-in for the bonus criteria) and because of the high level of accountability pressure all the schools already faced.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Background on Pay-for-Performance Programs and the New York City SPBP

  • Chapter Three

    Research Methods

  • Chapter Four

    Implementation of the Schoolwide Performance Bonus Program: Attitudes About and Understanding of the Program

  • Chapter Five

    Implementation of the Schoolwide Performance Bonus Program: Compensation Committee Process and Distribution Plans

  • Chapter Six

    Implementation of the Schoolwide Performance Bonus Program: Perceived Effects of the Bonus and Program Participation

  • Chapter Seven

    Effects on Progress Report and Student Test Scores

  • Chapter Eight

    Teacher Attitudes and Behaviors in SPBP and Control Schools

  • Chapter Nine

    Conclusions and Implications

Research conducted by

This research was conducted by RAND Education, a unit of the RAND Corporation, and partners at Vanderbilt University and the National Center on Performance Incentives (NCPI). The research was sponsored by the New York City Fund for Public Schools and NCPI.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.