Download

Download eBook for Free

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.6 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.

Summary Only

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback110 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

Abstract

“Sustainment surge” describes the increase in weapon systems repair activity brought on by the operational demands of wartime or contingency operations. In the mid-1980s, Congress began requiring the U.S. military to maintain a “core logistics capability” — skills to be retained at government-owned facilities — to prepare for surge demands, but implementing the requirement has been problematic. In the past 25 years, the Department of Defense has changed its force-planning construct from one that maintained a Cold War posture to one that maintained the ability to fight two simultaneous major theater wars, and recently to one that ensures the ability to respond to multiple but small contingencies.

In light of these changes, the authors of this report look at how the nature of surge has changed, whether legislation has hindered management in developing effective and efficient ways to manage surge, and whether the effectiveness and efficiency of surge planning can be improved. They use depot production and overtime data for operations such as Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom to argue that the nature of surge has indeed changed. They also examine how the nation’s three air logistics centers interpret legislative guidance as they manage surge requirements. The authors’ recommendations include continual development and assessment of metrics for surge operations, benchmarking internal operations with those of contractors, improving (and in some cases centralizing) data systems, and incorporating contractors into the surge planning process.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    First Principles: “Core” and “Surge”

  • Chapter Three

    Changes in the Nature of Surge

  • Chapter Four

    Improving the Use of Contractors in Planning Surge

  • Chapter Five

    Rethinking Surge

  • Chapter Six

    Next Steps for the Air Force

  • Appendix

    Legislation Regarding “Core” Logistics Functions

Research conducted by

The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force and conducted by RAND Project AIR FORCE.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.