Considering the Creation of a Domestic Intelligence Agency in the United States
Lessons from the Experiences of Australia, Canada, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom
With terrorism still prominent on the U.S. agenda, whether the country's prevention efforts match the threat the United States faces continues to be central in policy debate. One element of this debate is questioning whether the United States should create a dedicated domestic intelligence agency. Case studies of five other democracies — Australia, Canada, France, Germany, and the UK — provide lessons and common themes that may help policymakers decide. The authors find that
- most of the five countries separate the agency that conducts domestic intelligence gathering from any arrest and detention powers
- each country has instituted some measure of external oversight over its domestic intelligence agency
- liaison with other international, foreign, state, and local agencies helps ensure the best sharing of information
- the boundary between domestic and international intelligence activities may be blurring.
- Full Document (pdf format) (File size 1 MB)
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Format: Paperback
- Pages: 216
- List Price: $33.50
- Price: $26.80
- ISBN/EAN: 9780833046178
- Document Number: MG-805-DHS
- Year: 2009
- Series: Monographs
Contents
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
Australia
Chapter Three
Canada
Chapter Four
France
Chapter Five
Germany
Chapter Six
The United Kingdom
Chapter Seven
Domestic Intelligence Agencies After September 11, 2001: How Five Nations Have Grappled with the Evolving Threat
Chapter Eight
Conclusions: Lessons for the United States
This research was sponsored by the United States Department of Homeland Security and was conducted jointly under the auspices of the Homeland Security Program within RAND Infrastructure, Safety, and Environment and the Intelligence Policy Center of the RAND National Security Research Division.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.


