Alternative Models for Risk Assessment of Toxic Emissions

This Note is the second in a series of RAND reports developing and applying a general methodology for assessing the control costs and chronic health risks of toxic pollutant emissions from coal-fired electric power plants. The first report, Risk-Cost Assessment Methodology for Toxic Pollutants from Fossil Fuel Power Plants, RAND/R-2993-EPRI, developed the methodological framework and applied it in a case study of arsenic emissions from a hypothetical coal-fired plant. This Note expands the description of the methodology in the first report by discussing (1) alternative models for the framework, (2) simplified environmental transport models that may be used for initial analysis, and (3) the implications of certain assumptions used in the exposure analysis. It also describes the application of the methodology, including the simplified models, to a second case study: selenium emissions from a coal-fired plant.

Support RAND — Buy Now!
Format:
Paperback, 293 Pages
Year:
1985
List Price:
$55.00
Price:
$44.00 Special 20% Web Discount
Add to Cart
Additional Ordering Options
Download eBook for Free

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Format: Paperback
  • Pages: 293
  • List Price: $55.00
  • Price: $44.00
  • Document Number: N-2261-EPRI
  • Year: 1985
  • Series: Notes

This report is part of the RAND Corporation note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.

My RAND ?

Saved Items

Recommended