The Grand Canyon Controversy--1967 : Further Economic Comparisons of Nuclear Alternatives.

by Alan Carlin, William E. Hoehn

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback18 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

An updating of P-3302 and Congressional testimony by the authors against the Grand Canyon dam projects. Calculation methods have been changed to credit the proposed alternative nuclear power plants with the Federal Power Commission's regular energy value adjustment: half the savings from replacing more expensive steam-generated peakload power. Also, cost-benefit ratios are given at both 3-1/8 (Bureau of Reclamation figure) and 5 percent interest rates. Nuclear plant costs were deliberately overstated for unassailability--if the paper were intended to evaluate current nuclear power economics for private utilities, the authors would endorse figures at least $10 per kilowatt lower. Nevertheless, this analysis finds the benefit/cost ratios of the dams to be 0.52-0.78 to one compared with the nuclear alternatives. The higher the interest rate, the greater the difference, because the dams are more capital intensive. (See also P-3505, P-3541, P-3548.) 18 pp. Ref.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.