How will the Vietnam war end — or not end? A clear-cut victory by either side seems unobtainable now, leaving a situation ranging from something less satisfying to the United States than the way things turned out in South Korea, to something less satisfying to the North Vietnamese than what the Chinese Communists attained in 1949. The author describes possible outcomes in five scenarios: South Korea — the closest to a favorable outcome by the SV government and possibly by the United States; Stalemate — a costly prolongation of the present situation; Standoff — up to battalion-size skirmishes and local accommodations following a declared ceasefire; Six Kingdoms — the division of South Vietnam into separate territorial strongholds; and Shanghai — the collapse and disintegration of the SV army and government. None is really an outcome; all are new stages in the struggle; all postulate some form of continued fighting; all allow considerable room for maneuver.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.