TACTICS II

Maneuver Logic for Computer Simulation of Dogfight Engagements

by R. L. Spicer, L. G. Martin

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback46 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

Abstract

A description of maneuver logic for fighter aircraft for computer simulation of one-on-one, close-in air combat. The objective of the logic is to require each aircraft to attempt to achieve a weapon firing opportunity against the other aircraft, primarily within the opponent's rear hemisphere, while denying the opponent any firing opportunities, if possible. The technique used involves directing each aircraft to fly a pursuit course on some point — called the dogfight pursuit point — behind or to the side and above or below its opponent. This logic has been incorporated into the Rand TACTICS-II computer model, which can simulate a wide variety of three-dimensional aerial engagements. The model has been used to simulate dogfights under various starting conditions. The results compare favorably with flight test combats and basic U.S. Air Force fighter maneuvers.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.