Quality of Care Provided by Physician's Extenders in Air Force Primary Medicine Clinics
Evaluates the quality of care of physician extenders (PEs) (23 physician assistants and seven primary care nurse practitioners) in Air Force primary medicine clinics, as part of an evaluation of PEs assuming care formerly provided by physicians. PEs performed at least as well as M.D.s on 25 out of 28 nonredundant process-of-care criteria. Nurse practitioners met the M.D. standard on 14 of 19 criteria. No major differences were found in PEs' use of ancillary services (laboratory and X-ray) or orders for further care when controlling for case-mix. As expected, PEs consulted M.D.s infrequently, but more often for serious complaints and at rates similar to those found in other PE studies. The study concludes that the Air Force can deliver the same quality of care when PEs treat a sizable proportion of patients formerly treated by M.D.s.
- Full Document (pdf format) (File size 3.5 MB)
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Format: Paperback
- Pages: 86
- List Price: $25.00
- Price: $20.00
- ISBN/EAN: 0-8330-0174-4
- Document Number: R-2436-AF
- Year: 1980
- Series: Reports
This report is part of the RAND Corporation report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
