The Other World War
This report is intended to serve as a primer for Air Force officers who must gain a basic understanding of the phenomenon of terrorism. It addresses numerous issues touching on the definition, theory, tactics, targets, and effects of terrorism, and the threat that terrorism poses to the U.S. Air Force, which is both a potential target of terrorist actions and a potential instrument of preemptive retaliation. The author suggests that past doctrines, training, and practices do not apply in the war of terrorism. At the same time, we are not defenseless against terrorist attacks. They are not, and are not likely to be, seriously incapacitating. Terrorists can always inflict damage, but they cannot “win” unless they manage to throw their target into a state of hysteria. Despite their mobility, their fanaticism, their advantage of surprise, and their emotional impact, terrorists do not have the capability to inflict crippling damage on the U.S. military. However, the U.S. military will have to develop new capabilities and doctrines to meet the challenge.
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web-Only
- Paperback Pages: 36
- Paperback ISBN/EAN: 0-8330-0677-0
- Document Number: R-3302-AF
- Year: 1985
- Series: Reports
This report is part of the RAND Corporation report series. The report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.