Download Free Electronic Document
|PDF file||0.2 MB||Best for desktop computers.
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.
|ePub file||1.9 MB||Best for mobile devices.
On desktop computers and some mobile devices, you may need to download an eBook reader to view ePub files. Calibre is an example of a free and open source e-book library management application.
|mobi file||0.7 MB||Best for Kindle 1-3.
On desktop computers and some mobile devices, you may need to download an eBook reader to view mobi files. Amazon Kindle is the most popular reader for mobi files.
Purchase Print Copy
|Add to Cart||Paperback12 pages||$9.95||$7.96 20% Web Discount|
- What is driving both regional (e.g., Iran and Saudi Arabia) and extra-regional (e.g., Russia) players to intervene?
- Who are the internal actors, and are they operating as conduits of external influence?
- How do the external players fit in, and what are the possible outcomes of their involvement?
Less than two years since the beginning of the uprising in Syria, localized protests have morphed into full-blown civil conflict. Along with internal escalation, the conflict has drawn in external actors, including Syria's neighbors and extra-regional powers. With the regional balance of power hinging on the conflict's outcome, Middle Eastern and extra-regional states have taken sides — some in support of the Assad regime, others in support of the opposition. RAND convened a group of 26 experts who cover Syria and the various external players to participate in an analytic exercise on November 16, 2012, to generate a greater understanding of the parties and issues in play. The report begins by analyzing what is driving both regional (e.g., Iran and Saudi Arabia) and extra-regional (e.g., Russia) players to intervene in the Syrian conflict. It then proceeds to look at the internal actors (e.g., the Free Syrian Army and Alawite community) that may operate as conduits of external influence. The report concludes with an examination of the relationships between external and internal actors and possible effects of these groups' actions.
External Players Might Affect the Conflict's Outcome
- The financial and military aid flowing into Syria from external state actors has the potential to perpetuate the civil war in Syria and ignite larger regional hostilities between Sunni and Shi'a Muslims.
- There is an asymmetry of interests among external actors: Those supporting the Assad regime see the conflict's stakes in starker terms than do supporters of the opposition.
- External influence in the Syrian conflict would be decisive only if the United States significantly increased the scope of its support to the opposition or Iran or Russia significantly ratcheted back their support for Assad.
Internal Players Are Expected to Have Less Effect
- None of the "fence sitters" inside Syria are likely to tip the balance of the conflict.
- Increased jihadi participation within the opposition will result in less support from most external actors and from "fence sitters" inside Syria.