Communication and Democracy: Coincident Revolutions and the Emergent Dictators
Protecting and expanding democracy around the globe is a perennial national security interest for the United States. A standard vehicle for democratization has been economic development. Another factor which stimulates both democratization and economic growth, namely access to information, could be consistent with the historically strong statistical correlation between democracy and development and might also help explain some of the recent unprecedented political changes. This study addresses the relationship between democracy and the new communication media by applying theory and data analysis to the task. The author concludes that one cannot reject a hypothesis that democracy and networked communication are positively correlated.
-
Download Individual Chapters Below
Note: Many electronic documents posted prior to 2003 are available as chapter PDFs or HTML files linked from the Contents.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web-Only
- Pages: 120
- Document Number: RGSD-127
- Year: 1997
- Series: Dissertations
Contents
Preface HTML
Figures and Tables HTML
Abstract HTML
Acknowledgments HTML
Chapter One
Introduction: Coincident Revolutions HTML
Chapter Two
The Case of the Soviet Union: The Dictator's Dilemma HTML
Chapter Three
Qualitative Comparisons: A Brave New World or New World Order? HTML
Chapter Four
Quantitative Analyses: The Empty Corner HTML
Chapter Five
Implications for Policy: Communicating Democracy HTML
Appendix A
Data HTML
Bibliography HTML
This report is part of the RAND Corporation dissertation series. PRGS dissertations are produced by graduate fellows of the Pardee RAND Graduate School, the world's leading producer of Ph.D.'s in policy analysis. The dissertations are supervised, reviewed, and approved by a PRGS faculty committee overseeing each dissertation.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
