The Cost of Class Size Reduction
Advice for Policy Makers
Class-size reduction (CSR) in California was a popular, rapidly implemented reform that improved student performance. This dissertation provides information to state-level policy makers that will help them avoid two implementation problems seen in California's CSR implementation. The first problem was with flat, per student reimbursement scheme did not adequately cover costs in districts with larger pre-CSR class-sizes or smaller schools. To help policy-makers understand the relationship between existing conditions at schools (enrollment, existing class size), policy choices (class-size goal, class size measurement mechanism), and costs, four simple "rules of thumb" were created through analysis of simulation of CSR in seven Florida school districts. At a classroom cost of $53,000, the "rules of thumb" per student cost for CSR is $435 for reduction to 20, double for reduction to 17 and triple for reduction to 15 when existing class size is 24. The price moves up or down $80 for each change in existing class size above or below 24. Setting the class size goal as a hard ceiling instead of allowing rounding increases costs by about $240 at enrollment of 100. This extra cost declines as enrollments increase to 350 where costs are remain about $30 higher. Schools with enrollments under 100 face costs that are 5% to 10% higher. These "rules of thumb" and three other reimbursement strategies are evaluated for their ability to adequately estimate reimbursements for the cost of CSR. The strategy used in California, of a flat per student reimbursement, was the least efficient. Strategies using district information on costs, class sizes, and enrollments are adequate for reimbursing districts. The "rules of thumb" was the most robust strategy for reimbursing schools. A second problem seen in California was a decrease in the qualification level of the kindergarten through third teacher workforce. The largest decrease were in schools with higher concentrations of low-income or minority students. Modeling of the flow of K-3 teachers during the first year of CSR shows within district transfers create more vacancies in schools with more black or Hispanic students. These vacancies were then more likely to be filled with unqualified teachers. Potential policy responses to this problem are to not fill classrooms created by CSR with transfer teachers, and to provide incentives for teachers to remain in schools that are difficult to staff.
- Full Document (pdf format) (File size 10.7 MB)
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.
-
Download Individual Chapters Below
Note: Many electronic documents posted prior to 2003 are available as chapter PDFs or HTML files linked from the Contents.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web-Only
- Pages: 256
- Document Number: RGSD-156
- Year: 2000
- Series: Dissertations
Contents
Abstract PDF
Acknowledgments PDF
Introduction PDF
Chapter One
Policy Choices and Class Size Reduction PDF
Chapter Two
Context of CSR Implementation PDF
Chapter Three
The Dollar Cost of CSR PDF
Chapter Four
Reimbursement Strategies PDF
Chapter Five
Teacher Qualifications, an Unintended Cost of CSR PDF
Chapter Six
Discussion and Conclusions PDF
Appendix One
Data Details PDF
Appendix Two
Schools Dropped from Florida Simulation PDF
Appendix Three
Price Details PDF
Appendix Four
School-Level Conditions in the Florida Sample PDF
Appendix Five
Cost of CSR Breakdowns PDF
Appendix Six
Cost Savings from Converting Space Into Classrooms PDF
Appendix Seven
No Appendix 7
Appendix Eight
Comparison of Reimbursement Methods PDF
Appendix Nine
Descriptors of California Teachers Between 1995-96 and 1998-99 PDF
Appendix Ten
Teacher Flow Regressions PDF
References PDF
This report is part of the RAND Corporation dissertation series. PRGS dissertations are produced by graduate fellows of the Pardee RAND Graduate School, the world's leading producer of Ph.D.'s in policy analysis. The dissertations are supervised, reviewed, and approved by a PRGS faculty committee overseeing each dissertation.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
