- How is the Coastal Louisiana Risk Assessment (CLARA) model structured?
- What are CLARA's inputs and outputs?
- How was CLARA used to support the development of Louisiana's 2012 Coastal Master Plan?
- How does Louisiana's 2012 Coastal Master Plan help to reduce storm surge flood damage over the next fifty years?
Motivated by the devastating effects of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005 and Gustav and Ike in 2008, planners and policymakers in the State of Louisiana have updated the state's Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sustainable Coast (the "Master Plan"). The resulting Master Plan proposes a range of risk reduction and coastal restoration projects to reduce storm surge flood risks to coastal communities and address other objectives to help create a more sustainable coast over the next 50 years. To support this process, the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority of Louisiana asked RAND to create an analytical model, the Coastal Louisiana Risk Assessment (CLARA) model, to estimate flood depths and damage that occurs as a result of major storms. CLARA made it possible to systematically evaluate potential projects for inclusion in the Master Plan on the basis of how well they reduce flood damage in Louisiana's coastal region. CLARA was also used to evaluate the flood damage reduction provided by the final Master Plan. Results from this analysis show that storm surge flood damage represents a major threat to coastal Louisiana and that, if no action is taken, this damage can be expected to grow substantially in the future. Implementing the Master Plan, however, could substantially reduce future damage. For instance, average annual damage is projected to increase to between $7 billion and $21 billion per year by 2061 in a future without action, but, with the Master Plan in place, this damage level is reduced to between $3 billion and $5 billion.
The Coastal Louisiana Risk Assessment (CLARA) Model Is Based on the Principles of Quantitative Risk Analysis
- The risk is the product of the annual likelihood of storm surge flooding at different depths and the damage that results from this flooding.
- Likelihood is divided into the threat, which represents the probability that a surge-producing storm will occur, and the vulnerability of the hurricane protection infrastructure.
- The model simulates consequences for a "future without action" and a "future with the final Master Plan in place" in 2012, 2036, and 2061, for three scenarios that reflect different assumptions about future rates of sea-level rise and coastal subsidence.
CLARA Uses Several Types of Information to Estimate Flood Depths and Resulting Damage
- Estimated surge and wave heights from 40 simulated storms across the Louisiana coast selected to best represent the range of possible coastal flooding threats.
- Data that characterize the hurricane protection system.
- An inventory of economic assets on the Louisiana coast, updated with information from the 2010 U.S. census.
CLARA Helped Louisiana Compare and Rank Projects for Inclusion in Its Master Plan
- The results show that, if no action is taken, flood damage can be expected to grow substantially in the future.
- The Master Plan can reduce flood damage in many areas of the coast through a combination of structural and nonstructural risk reduction investments and coastal restoration projects.
- Damage reduction is notable across all scenarios considered.
Table of Contents
Overview of CLARA
Measuring Hurricane Hazard and Flood Recurrence
Calculating Surge and Wave Overtopping
Estimating Protection System Fragility
Calculating Interior Drainage in Protected Areas
Assessing Economic Value, Growth, and Flood Damage
Uncertainty in CLARA
Supporting Master Plan Development with CLARA
Results from the Final Master Plan Analysis
This research was sponsored by the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority of the State of Louisiana and was conducted in the RAND Gulf States Policy Institute and the Environment, Energy, and Economic Development Program within RAND Infrastructure, Safety, and Environment.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation technical report series. RAND technical reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; present discussions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.