Policy and practice impacts of research funded by the Economic and Social Research Council
A case study of the Future of Work programme, approach and analysis
Wooding et al. examine how the Economic and Social Research Council’s (ESRC) Future of Work (FoW) programme influenced policy and professional practice. They consider whether the Payback Framework, a conceptual model for research evaluation, is appropriate for social science, and look at the challenges in evaluating the impact of research on the social sciences. The main findings of this report were that the FoW programme had significant impacts on knowledge, research, public policy, and the policies and practices of organizations; however, the authors determined that the impact that a policy had was influenced by its environment. The FoW programme achieved this impact by providing total access to policymakers and, through the work of the Media Fellow, enhanced the impact on policymakers. They also concluded that the Payback Framework is a useful model for evaluating social science research; however, some impacts may be inaccessible to evaluation, and a confluence of inputs often make it difficult to attribute policy change to a given input. The project collected evidence through a review of the literature, interviews with key individuals involved in the programme, a survey of principal investigators, and four case studies of individual research grants. This research presents the detailed evidence collected during the study, including the complete case studies and a summary of evidence, analysis, and conclusions.
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web-Only
- Pages: 65
- Document Number: TR-435-ESRC
- Year: 2007
- Series: Technical Reports
Methodology and project structure
The research described in this report was prepared for the Economic and Social Research Council and was conducted by RAND Europe.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation technical report series. RAND technical reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; present discussions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.