Comparison of Medicare Spending and Outcomes for Beneficiaries with Lower Extremity Joint Replacements

The primary objective of this study is to conduct a set of analyses comparing costs and outcomes of lower extremity joint replacement patients discharged to three different post-acute settings: inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), and patient homes. Multivariate techniques are employed in order to adjust these analyses for observable differences in severity of illness across sites of care. In doing so, multinomial models are used that predict which type of institutional post-acute care a beneficiary accesses, and these predictors are described. In addition, instrumental variables (IV) techniques are used that allow for the accounting of unobserved patient selection into IRFs and SNFs in order to learn how patient costs and outcomes are affected by the availability of IRF and SNF care.

Download Free Electronic Document

Document Details

  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Pages: 44
  • Document Number: WR-271-MEDPAC
  • Year: 2005
  • Series: Working Papers

The research described in this report was prepared for the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission and was performed by RAND Health.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings and to solicit informal peer review. They have been approved for circulation by RAND but may not have been formally edited or peer reviewed.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.

My RAND ?

Saved Items

Recommended