on Facebook
on Twitter
on YouTube
Document Information
The Impact of Liability on the Physician Labor Market
This study examines the impact of malpractice reforms on physician behavior using a new measure of liability risk and a nationally representative, individual-level dataset on physician behavior. The authors first develop a theoretic model in which physicians are unable to fully insure against liability risk. They then match their liability measure to data on physician behavior from the Physician Practice Costs and Income Survey (PPCIS). Data from the PPCIS bracket a period of substantial state-level legal reform between 1983 and 1988, which provides identifying variation in their liability measure. They estimate the impact of liability reform on hours worked. They find an estimated elasticity of hours worked to liability exposure of -0.285 for the full sample of physicians. The interpretation is that a 10 percent increase in expected liability costs (not necessarily malpractice premiums) is associated with a 2.85 percent decrease in hours worked. The effect for physicians age 55 or older is much larger: They find an elasticity of -1.224 for this category. They also examine the link between their ‘pure’ liability measure and malpractice premiums. They find that an increase in $1 of expected liability is associated with a $0.699 to $1.05 increase in malpractice premiums, although there remains substantial unexplained variation in premiums after accounting for expected liability and observable demographic characteristics of physicians.
Free, downloadable PDF file(s) are available below.
RAND makes an electronic version of this document available for free as a public service.
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.
Contents
Chapter One:
Introduction
Chapter Two:
Labor Supply and Liability Exposure
Chapter Three:
Data Description
Chapter Four:
Estimation Results
Chapter Five:
Conclusion
Data Appendix
This research was performed by the RAND Institute for Civil Justice.
This product is part of the RAND working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings, to solicit informal peer review, or to publish a technical appendix to an article published in a scientific journal. They have been approved for circulation by the sponsoring RAND research unit but typically have not been formally edited or peer reviewed. Unless otherwise indicated, working papers can be quoted and cited without permission of the author, provided the source is clearly referred to as a working paper.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
* RAND research is conducted across divisions, centers, and projects; these organizational components are represented in the "Related RAND Divisions" section above.
Top
RAND® is a registered trademark. Copyright © 1994-2010 RAND Corporation. Last Modified: December 11, 2007 