Document Information
How do the public value different outcomes of social care?
Estimation of preference weights for ASCOT
This RAND Europe Working Paper is part of the Measuring Outcomes for Public Service Users (MOPSU) project funded by the UK Treasury under the Invest to Save programme and led by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). The preference study was undertaken as part of the personal social services element of the project, which is led by the Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), with the objective that the measures of social care outcomes will reflect the relative importance of the domains (e.g. food and nutrition, accommodation) and levels of these domains, rather than an assumption that all domains, and improvements between levels within those domains, are of equal importance. This Working Paper establishes preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) measures of social care outcomes, and examines whether the use of 4-level domains improves the sensitivity of the measure at lower levels of need than 3-level domains.
Free, downloadable PDF file(s) are available below.
RAND makes an electronic version of this document available for free as a public service.
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 7.0 or higher for the best experience.
Contents
Chapter One:
Survey design
Chapter Two:
Sample characteristics
Chapter Three:
Exploratory analysis of best-worst experiments
Chapter Four:
Modelling the best-worst choice data
Chapter Five:
Summary
Appendix A:
Wording of domain levels
Appendix B:
Choice elicitation and model estimation procedure in Best-Worst Scaling data
The research described in this report was prepared for the Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU) and the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and was conducted by RAND Europe.
This product is part of the RAND working paper series. RAND working papers are intended to share researchers' latest findings, to solicit informal peer review, or to publish a technical appendix to an article published in a scientific journal. They have been approved for circulation by the sponsoring RAND research unit but typically have not been formally edited or peer reviewed. Unless otherwise indicated, working papers can be quoted and cited without permission of the author, provided the source is clearly referred to as a working paper.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
* RAND research is conducted across divisions, centers, and projects; these organizational components are represented in the "Related RAND Divisions" section above.


Top