Analyzing Measure Use in Ecosystem Management


Last revised October 1, 1998 (research conducted 1997 - 1998)
The last five to ten years have witnessed many efforts to develop and useenvironmental measures at the federal, state, eco-region, and local levels. These initiatives have addressed air and water quality, species health,sustainable development, ecosystem management, and other environmental issues. Such measures are used to help define and describe the state of naturalresources; to provide the basis for setting goals; and to measure progresstowards those goals. Well designed measures can aid in ecosystem management andpolicy decision making by providing understandable and timely data about theecosystem status. However, it is unclear how much such measures are actuallyused in environmental management and policy decision making. This RAND studyexamined how such measures are contributing to decision making in actualapplications.

For this project RAND began by analyzing how environmental measures are developedand used in decision making. First, the RAND researchers examined a wide range ofmeasure efforts to understand the different ways that such measures are used. Then a subset of cases where measures were more likely to be used directly inpolicy and management decision making were identified and examined. This analysisfocused on understanding what was the relationship between monitoring data,measures, modeling, and decision making. By analyzing these practical cases andsurveying practitioners in the field RAND asked and answered the questions: Whatmakes the measures useful for decision making? What lessons can be learned forother ecosystem management efforts which are trying to use measures moreeffectively in the decision making process? What are the implications forfederal monitoring and assessment efforts? The cases which were analyzed covereda range of ecosystem efforts in terms of scale, environmental issues addressed,and types of decision makers. A smaller subset of nine in depth case studieswere further analyzed to illustrate and explore the range of issues. These ninecase studies included: Eglin Air Force Base; Niobrara Preserve; Multi-SpeciesConservation Plan in San Diego; Ohio EPA; Tampa Bay; Mecklenburg County, NC;Chesapeake Bay Program and Grizzly Bears in the Swan Valley. The results of thisproject are currently being documented.


S&T Policy Institute Home  |   RAND Infrastructure, Safety, and Environment  |  RAND Home

RAND operated the S&TPI from 1992 - 2003 and maintains this Web site only as an archive
of the work that was done during that time. If you have any questions about the work
referenced on this Web site, please contact us via email.