<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

     <title>RAND Research Topic: Air Warfare</title>
     <link rel="self" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/air-warfare.xml"/>
     <updated>2012-05-24T14:56:12Z</updated>
     <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/air-warfare.html" />
     <rights>Copyright (c) 2012, The RAND Corporation</rights>
     <author>
       <name>RAND Corporation</name>
     </author>
     <id>http://www.rand.org/topics/air-warfare.html</id>
	 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Israeli Mistakes Against Hybrid Adversaries Serve as Cautionary Tale for U.S. Military</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1085.html</id>
   <published>Jan 20, 2012</published>
   <updated>Jan 20, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">A review of recent Israeli military conflicts indicates the United States may be ill-prepared for &quot;hybrid&quot; warfare against state-sponsored adversaries who have a modicum of training and small force numbers, but possess advanced weapons and enough expertise to challenge the U.S. military.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1085.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Israeli Mistakes Against Hybrid Adversaries Serve as Cautionary Tale for U.S. Military</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2012/01/20.html</id>
   <published>Jan 19, 2012</published>
   <updated>Jan 19, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">A review of recent Israeli military conflicts indicates the United States may be ill-prepared for &quot;hybrid&quot; warfare against state-sponsored adversaries who have a modicum of training and small force numbers, but possess advanced weapons and enough expertise to challenge the U.S. military.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2012/01/20.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Access Challenges and Implications for Airpower in the Western Pacific</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD267.html</id>
   <published>Aug 15, 2011</published>
   <updated>Aug 15, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Examines the risk of U.S.-China conflict based on a variety of theoretical works on conflict, applied to the U.S.-China relationship.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD267.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Feasibility of Laser Power Transmission to a High-Altitude Unmanned Aerial Vehicle</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR898.html</id>
   <published>Jun 9, 2011</published>
   <updated>Jun 9, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">This report examines whether a laser-beam-powered unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) could have practical merit, focusing on the altitude, range, persistence, and power possible for a laser-photovoltaic aircraft that uses current technology. Commercially available lasers and photovoltaic cells could provide a UAV with sustained extremely high altitude and moderate persistence and payload.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR898.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Flawed Strategy, Not a &apos;Failure of Air Power,&apos; Led to Israel&apos;s Disappointing Performance in 2006 Lebanon War</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG835.html</id>
   <published>May 22, 2011</published>
   <updated>May 22, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Israel&apos;s disappointing performance in its war against Hezbollah in Lebanon in 2006 did not reflect a &quot;failure of air power,&quot; but rather a failure of Israel&apos;s political and military leaders to properly assess the enemy, set achievable goals, apply an effective strategy and adequately manage public expectations.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG835.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Flawed Strategy, Not a &apos;Failure of Air Power,&apos; Led to Israel&apos;s Disappointing Performance in 2006 Lebanon War</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2011/05/23.html</id>
   <published>May 22, 2011</published>
   <updated>May 22, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Israel&apos;s disappointing performance in its war against Hezbollah in Lebanon in 2006 did not reflect a &quot;failure of air power,&quot; but rather a failure of Israel&apos;s political and military leaders to properly assess the enemy, set achievable goals, apply an effective strategy and adequately manage public expectations.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2011/05/23.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Analysis of Chinese Military Doctrine Indicates China Could Pose Serious Challenge to U.S. and Allied Air Forces</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2011/02/21/index1.html</id>
   <published>Feb 21, 2011</published>
   <updated>Feb 21, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">An exhaustive study of Chinese military sources reveals that a future Chinese air force campaign would, under most likely scenarios, seriously test the United States and its allies in a conflict.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2011/02/21/index1.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Analysis of Chinese Military Doctrine Indicates China Could Pose Serious Challenge to U.S. and Allied Air Forces</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG915.html</id>
   <published>Feb 18, 2011</published>
   <updated>Feb 18, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">An exhaustive study of Chinese military sources reveals that a future Chinese air force campaign would, under most likely scenarios, seriously test the United States and its allies in a conflict.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG915.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Adding Value to Air Force Management Through Building Partnerships Assessment</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR907.html</id>
   <published>Dec 17, 2010</published>
   <updated>Dec 17, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">The U.S. Air Force works to build strong and enduring partnerships with allies and friendly nations, to reinforce their capacity to defend themselves and to work in coalitions, and to ensure U.S. access to foreign territories. This volume evaluates existing Air Force capacity to conduct assessments of its security cooperation programs and describes a framework for improving assessment efforts.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR907.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Air Power</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP1412.html</id>
   <published>Aug 4, 2010</published>
   <updated>Aug 4, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Surveys the subject of air power as an area of research in international security studies and provides a bibliography of significant works and useful online resources.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP1412.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Enhancing Combat Operations Through Improved Air-Ground Integration</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG793.html</id>
   <published>Apr 13, 2009</published>
   <updated>Apr 13, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Although airpower capabilities have improved dramatically in the past decade, the joint warfighting potential offered by these capabilities is not being fully realized, as illustrated during combat operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. The authors propose several alternatives and suggest a new joint warfighting concept designed to enhance the prioritization and synchronization of joint fires and maneuver. &lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG793.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Statement Regarding Media Coverage of F-35 Joint Strike Fighter</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2008/09/25.html</id>
   <published>Sep 25, 2008</published>
   <updated>Sep 25, 2008</updated>
   <summary type="html">Andrew Hoehn, Director of RAND Project Air Force, made a statement today regarding articles that have appeared in the Australian press with assertions regarding a war game in which analysts from RAND were involved.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2008/09/25.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">U.S. Air Force and Navy Reinforce One Another in Strike-Warfare Operations</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG655.html</id>
   <published>Dec 27, 2007</published>
   <updated>Dec 27, 2007</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy have steadily developed exceptional cross-service harmony in their conduct of integrated strike operations since the first Persian Gulf War in 1991. That close harmony contrasts sharply with the situation that prevailed throughout most of the Cold War. &lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG655.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Common Battlefield Training for Airmen</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG624.html</id>
   <published>Oct 3, 2007</published>
   <updated>Oct 3, 2007</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Air Force members who do not routinely cross a defended perimeter when deployed may not have received sufficient training for doing so when they need to. The authors conducted surveys and interviews to determine the kinds of experiences airmen have had &amp;ldquo;outside the wire,&amp;rdquo; worked with subject-matter experts to categorize them and suggest training levels, and developed a series of recommendations for course content and further areas for study.&lt;/p&gt;
</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG624.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Learning Large Lessons: The Evolving Roles of Ground Power and Air Power in the Post-Cold War Era</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG405-1.html</id>
   <published>Mar 8, 2007</published>
   <updated>Mar 8, 2007</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The relative roles of U.S. ground and air power in major operations and campaigns have shifted since the end of the Cold War. To assess this shift (i.e., between the Army and Air Force, respectively), the author of this report analyzed post&amp;ndash;Cold War conflicts in Iraq (1991), Bosnia (1995), Kosovo (1999), Afghanistan (2001), and Iraq (2003). This revised edition includes updates and an index.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG405-1.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Learning Large Lessons: The Evolving Roles of Ground Power and Air Power in the Post-Cold War Era &amp;mdash; Executive Summary</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG405z1.html</id>
   <published>Mar 7, 2007</published>
   <updated>Mar 7, 2007</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The relative roles of U.S. ground and air power in major operations and campaigns have shifted since the end of the Cold War. To assess this shift (i.e., between the Army and Air Force, respectively), this executive summary discusses four of the five post&amp;ndash;Cold War conflicts analyzed in the larger monograph: Iraq (1991), Kosovo (1999), Afghanistan (2001), and Iraq (2003).&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG405z1.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Air Power Against Terror: America&apos;s Conduct of Operation Enduring Freedom</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG166-1.html</id>
   <published>Nov 7, 2006</published>
   <updated>Nov 7, 2006</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The terrorist attacks of 9/11 plunged the United States into a determined counteroffensive against Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda terrorist network. This report details the initial U.S. military response to those attacks, namely, the destruction of al Qaeda&amp;rsquo;s terrorist infrastructure and the removal of the ruling Taliban regime in Afghanistan. The author emphasizes several distinctive achievements in this war, including the use of precision air-delivered weapons that were effective irrespective of weather, the first combat use of Predator unmanned aerial vehicles armed with Hellfire missiles, and the integrated employment of high-altitude drones and other air- and space-based sensors that gave CENTCOM unprecedented round-the-clock awareness of enemy activity.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG166-1.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">U.S. Joint Doctrine Should Be Revised to  Reflect the Changing Roles of Air and Ground Power</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB195.html</id>
   <published>Jul 26, 2006</published>
   <updated>Jul 26, 2006</updated>
   <summary type="html">This research brief looks at applications of U.S. air and ground power in post-Cold War operations and the implications of air power largely supplanting ground power in future deep operations.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB195.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Role of Intelligence in Deciding the Battle of Britain</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20060616.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2005</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2005</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The successful employment of German air power in the Battle of Britain was greatly hindered by abysmal intelligence. The Luftwaffe never developed an accurate picture of enemy strengths and weaknesses, and this contributed to preventing it from bringing force to bear at the decisive point of battle. Although certain aspects of British intelligence were equally flawed, it ultimately proved itself to be an indispensable adjunct to the operational success of Fighter Command. This article focuses on the contribution made to Luftwaffe and RAF operations during the Battle of Britain by their respective intelligence gathering institutions. It is an investigation into the extent to which activities in the realm of intelligence can explain the eventual British victory.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20060616.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Operation Enduring Freedom: An Assessment</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9148.html</id>
   <published>Dec 12, 2005</published>
   <updated>Dec 12, 2005</updated>
   <summary type="html">This research brief describes work documented in Air Power Against Terror: America&amp;rsquo;s Conduct of Operation Enduring Freedom (MG-166-CENTAF).</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9148.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 </feed>

