<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

     <title>RAND Research Topic: Alternative Dispute Resolution</title>
     <link rel="self" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/alternative-dispute-resolution.xml"/>
     <updated>2012-05-24T14:56:14Z</updated>
     <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/alternative-dispute-resolution.html" />
     <rights>Copyright (c) 2012, The RAND Corporation</rights>
     <author>
       <name>RAND Corporation</name>
     </author>
     <id>http://www.rand.org/topics/alternative-dispute-resolution.html</id>
	 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Would Increased Transparency Improve the U.S. Civil Justice System?</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/commercial_books/CB528.html</id>
   <published>Apr 24, 2012</published>
   <updated>Apr 24, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">Some argue that the confidentiality of the civil justice system keeps it working efficiently and fairly; others argue that the public is being denied information about hazards that may cause harm. A balanced approach to increasing transparency can improve the system, raise public confidence, and protect litigants&apos; privacy. </summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/commercial_books/CB528.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Would Increased Transparency Improve the Civil Justice System?</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9661.html</id>
   <published>Apr 24, 2012</published>
   <updated>Apr 24, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">This research brief provides an overview of a collection of essays, a collaborative project by the UCLA-RAND Center for Law and Public Policy, examining the trade-offs between transparency and confidentiality in the civil justice system.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9661.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">New Book Explores Transparency in the American Civil Justice System</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2012/04/24.html</id>
   <published>Apr 24, 2012</published>
   <updated>Apr 24, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">The quest for greater transparency in the American civil justice system is the topic of a new book of essays illustrating how a balanced approach to increasing transparency can improve the civil justice system, raise public confidence and protect litigants&apos; privacy.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2012/04/24.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Making the Civil Justice System More Efficient and Equitable</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/law-business-regulation/centers/civil-justice.html</id>
   <published>Oct 3, 2011</published>
   <updated>Oct 3, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The RAND Institute for Civil Justice (ICJ) conducts research on all aspects of civil justice, from trends in litigation and jury verdicts to punitive damages, compensation systems, and alternative dispute resolution. Directly or indirectly, civil justice issues have an impact on us all. </summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/law-business-regulation/centers/civil-justice.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Business-to-Business Arbitration in the United States: Perceptions of Corporate Counsel</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR781.html</id>
   <published>Jan 18, 2011</published>
   <updated>Jan 18, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Evidence suggests that arbitration clauses, though common in consumer contracts, are uncommon in commercial contracts, but research on why this may be so is scant. This report presents the findings of a survey and follow-up interviews of corporate counsel that sought to determine their thinking on domestic business-to-business arbitration and its use as an alternative to litigation.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR781.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Unintended Consequences of Court Arbitration: A Cautionary Tale from New Jersey</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP134.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2003</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">Arbitration programs appear to meet a demand for fair, adjudicative third-party hearings, but in doing so, they don&apos;t always improve court efficiency.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP134.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Alternative Dispute Resolution in Trial and Appellate Courts</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP117.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2003</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">This study reviews the available research on seven major court-administered alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures that appear to be particularly popular and representative of the broader range of alternatives.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP117.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Our Courts Ourselves: How the Alternative Dispute Resolution Movement Is Reshaping Our Legal System</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP1090.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2003</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Federal courts are now required by law to offer some form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), and many state courts require parties to attempt to resolve their cases through mediation before they can obtain a trial date. The author presents a personal critical perspective on the evolution of ADR in the legal world. She presents historical antecedents, discusses the &quot;community justice movement,&quot; the business community&apos;s joining of the ADR movement, and offers thoughts on the dispute resolution movement&apos;s contribution to changes in the view of the justice system.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP1090.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Assessing Claims Resolution Facilities: What We Need to Know</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP107.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2003</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">This article proposes an agenda for research on claims resolution facilities, the results of which could assist in improving the current set of facilities and fashioning better alternatives for the future.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP107.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Court-ordered Arbitration: An Alternative Overview</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP103.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2003</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">This article describes court-ordered arbitration and distinguishes it from other dispute resolution procedures.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP103.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Science in the Court:  Is There a Role for Alternative Dispute Resolution?</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP109.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2003</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2003</updated>
   <summary type="html">Science in the Court:  Is There a Role for Alternative Dispute Resolution?</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP109.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">ADR Research at the Crossroads</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP915.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2000</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2000</updated>
   <summary type="html">This article traces the development of empirical research on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and its impact on the legal system.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP915.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">A Research Agenda: What We Need to Know About Court-Connected ADR</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP871.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1999</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1999</updated>
   <summary type="html">Although practitioners of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) have long emphasized the benefits of substituting problem-solving processes for adjudication, empirical studies indicate that ADR may not save litigation costs or time.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP871.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Arbitration agreements in health care : myths and reality</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP746.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1997</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1997</updated>
   <summary type="html">Arbitration agreements in health care : myths and reality</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP746.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Just, Speedy, and Inexpensive?  : An Evaluation of Judicial Case Management Under the Civil Justice Reform Act</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR800.html</id>
   <published>Jan 1, 1996</published>
   <updated>Jan 1, 1996</updated>
   <summary type="html">This executive summary provides an overview of the purpose of the CJRA (Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990), the basic design of the evaluation, the key findings, and their policy implications. </summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR800.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">An Evaluation of Mediation and Early Neutral Evaluation Under the Civil Justice Reform Act</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR803.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1995</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1995</updated>
   <summary type="html">The report describes an assessment of the effects of six different alternative dispute resolution (ADR) programs that included mediation and early neutral evaluation.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR803.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Just, Speedy, and Inexpensive? An Evaluation of Judicial Case Management Under the CJRA</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9027.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1995</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1995</updated>
   <summary type="html">Examined the effects of the CJRA&apos;s (Civil Justice Reform Ac) case management principles on time to disposition, costs, and participants&apos; satisfaction and views of fairness.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9027.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Evaluating Agency Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs: A Users&apos; Guide to Data Collection and Use</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR534.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1994</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1994</updated>
   <summary type="html">Prepare a manual and develop prototype data collection instruments to assist those with responsibility for evaluating federal agency alternative dispute resolution programs.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR534.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Many doors? closing doors? : alternate dispute resolution and adjudication</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP439.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1994</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1994</updated>
   <summary type="html">Many doors? closing doors? : alternate dispute resolution and adjudication</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP439.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">A glass half full, a glass half empty : the use of alternative dispute resolution in mass personal injury litigation</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP446.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1994</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1994</updated>
   <summary type="html">A glass half full, a glass half empty : the use of alternative dispute resolution in mass personal injury litigation</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP446.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 </feed>

