<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

     <title>RAND Research Topic: Armored Vehicles</title>
     <link rel="self" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/armored-vehicles.xml"/>
     <updated>2012-05-24T14:56:15Z</updated>
     <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/armored-vehicles.html" />
     <rights>Copyright (c) 2012, The RAND Corporation</rights>
     <author>
       <name>RAND Corporation</name>
     </author>
     <id>http://www.rand.org/topics/armored-vehicles.html</id>
	 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Heavy Armor in the Future Security Environment</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP334.html</id>
   <published>Nov 8, 2011</published>
   <updated>Nov 8, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The U.S. Army is under pressure to demonstrate a valid need for heavy brigade combat teams in the future security environment &amp;mdash; an environment in which many believe that such units will be largely irrelevant. Through an examination of adversary capabilities in recent conflicts, the author explores whether heavy armored forces can be justified as a prominent component of the future U.S. Army.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP334.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">U.S. Combat and Tactical Wheeled Vehicle Fleets: Issues and Suggestions for Congress</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1093.html</id>
   <published>Feb 11, 2011</published>
   <updated>Feb 11, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Congress requested a study to assess the challenges in fielding U.S. ground combat and tactical wheeled vehicle fleets, including discussion of requirements; capability gaps; technology, operational, and business risks; and recommended actions.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1093.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Results from the Congressionally Mandated Study of U.S. Combat and Tactical Wheeled Vehicle</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9571.html</id>
   <published>Feb 11, 2011</published>
   <updated>Feb 11, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Congress requested a study to assess the challenges in fielding U.S. ground combat and tactical wheeled vehicle fleets, including discussion of requirements; capability gaps; technology, operational, and business risks; and recommended actions.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9571.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Observations on Recent Trends in Armored Forces</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP287.html</id>
   <published>Jun 30, 2010</published>
   <updated>Jun 30, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Militaries from the United States, Great Britain, Canada, Denmark, and Israel all see a role for heavy forces, including tanks, in irregular warfare and hybrid warfare environments because they reduce operational risk, minimize friendly casualties, and provide an intimidation factor against adversaries.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP287.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">In the Middle of the Fight: An Assessment of Medium-Armored Forces in Past Military Operations</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG709.html</id>
   <published>Nov 10, 2008</published>
   <updated>Nov 10, 2008</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;This monograph presents a qualitative assessment of the performance of medium-armored forces in 13 past conflicts that span the range of military operations. The accompanying analysis is designed to help inform U.S. Army decisions about fielding medium-armored forces in the future. The case histories yielded three major insights.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG709.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 </feed>

