<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

     <title>RAND Research Topic: Class-action Lawsuits</title>
     <link rel="self" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/class-action-lawsuits.xml"/>
     <updated>2012-05-24T14:56:27Z</updated>
     <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/class-action-lawsuits.html" />
     <rights>Copyright (c) 2012, The RAND Corporation</rights>
     <author>
       <name>RAND Corporation</name>
     </author>
     <id>http://www.rand.org/topics/class-action-lawsuits.html</id>
	 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Would Increased Transparency Improve the U.S. Civil Justice System?</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/commercial_books/CB528.html</id>
   <published>Apr 24, 2012</published>
   <updated>Apr 24, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">Some argue that the confidentiality of the civil justice system keeps it working efficiently and fairly; others argue that the public is being denied information about hazards that may cause harm. A balanced approach to increasing transparency can improve the system, raise public confidence, and protect litigants&apos; privacy. </summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/commercial_books/CB528.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Would Increased Transparency Improve the Civil Justice System?</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9661.html</id>
   <published>Apr 24, 2012</published>
   <updated>Apr 24, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">This research brief provides an overview of a collection of essays, a collaborative project by the UCLA-RAND Center for Law and Public Policy, examining the trade-offs between transparency and confidentiality in the civil justice system.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9661.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">New Book Explores Transparency in the American Civil Justice System</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2012/04/24.html</id>
   <published>Apr 24, 2012</published>
   <updated>Apr 24, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">The quest for greater transparency in the American civil justice system is the topic of a new book of essays illustrating how a balanced approach to increasing transparency can improve the civil justice system, raise public confidence and protect litigants&apos; privacy.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2012/04/24.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Making the Civil Justice System More Efficient and Equitable</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/law-business-regulation/centers/civil-justice.html</id>
   <published>Oct 3, 2011</published>
   <updated>Oct 3, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The RAND Institute for Civil Justice (ICJ) conducts research on all aspects of civil justice, from trends in litigation and jury verdicts to punitive damages, compensation systems, and alternative dispute resolution. Directly or indirectly, civil justice issues have an impact on us all. </summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/law-business-regulation/centers/civil-justice.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Group and Aggregate Litigation in the United States</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20090334.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2008</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2008</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;While a class action such as one brought under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 23 is certainly the most well-known mechanism for aggregating large numbers of similar claims, other approaches include mass joinder of parties, mass consolidation of separate cases, or multidistrict litigation transfer of federal cases from across the country into a single action for pretrial processing; corporate reorganizations under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code; large-scale inventories of clients controlled by a single attorney; government-initiated enforcement actions; and private attorneys general litigation brought on behalf of the general public.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP20090334.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">RAND Study Finds Class Actions Against Insurers Rose Prior to Recent Reforms and Many Cases Occurred Outside Public View</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2007/04/04.html</id>
   <published>Apr 4, 2007</published>
   <updated>Apr 4, 2007</updated>
   <summary type="html">April 4, 2007 news release: RAND Study Finds Class Actions Against Insurers Rose Prior to Recent Reforms and Many Cases Occurred Outside Public View.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2007/04/04.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Class Actions Against Insurers Rose Prior to Recent Reforms</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG587-1.html</id>
   <published>Apr 4, 2007</published>
   <updated>Apr 4, 2007</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The number of class action lawsuits filed against insurance companies in the United States increased sharply during the 1990s prior to the passage of the federal Class Action Fairness Act of 2005.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG587-1.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Anatomy of an Insurance Class Action</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9249.html</id>
   <published>Mar 13, 2007</published>
   <updated>Mar 13, 2007</updated>
   <summary type="html">This research brief describes characteristics of more than 700 class action cases against large U.S. insurers -- trends in claims, their allegations, and their outcomes -- including the vast majority of cases that never become certified as a class.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9249.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Asbestos-Related Claims Exceed 730,000, Cost More than $70 Billion</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG162.html</id>
   <published>May 10, 2005</published>
   <updated>May 10, 2005</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Claims for asbestos injuries have risen sharply since the 1990s and total more than 730,000 through 2002.  At least 8,400 defendants have paid more than $70 billion on the litigation, 42 percent of which has gone to claimants.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG162.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">RAND Study Finds More Than 730,000 People Have Filed Asbestos Injury Claims in U.S., Costing Defendants More Than $70 Billion</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2005/05/10.html</id>
   <published>May 9, 2005</published>
   <updated>May 9, 2005</updated>
   <summary type="html">RAND Study Finds More Than 730,000 People Have Filed Asbestos Injury Claims in U.S., Costing Defendants More Than $70 Billion</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2005/05/10.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Asbestos Litigation Costs and Compensation: An Interim Report</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB397.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2001</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2001</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The number of asbestos claims filed annually, the number and types of firms named as defendants in asbestos litigation, and the costs of the litigation to those defendants have all risen sharply in recent years. Given these trends, the authors examine the dimensions of asbestos litigation:  How many claims have been filed?  By whom? Against whom? For what kinds of conditions?  At what cost and with what economic effects?  And, if current trends continue, what will be the future costs of the litigation?&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB397.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Revisiting the Monster: New Myths and Realities of Class Action and Other Large Scale Litigation</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP979.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2001</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2001</updated>
   <summary type="html">She extends her consideration of mass tort litigation to include what she terms &quot;the new social policy torts&quot;: suits against tobacco companies, firearms manufacturers, and managed care organizations that are intended to change public policy.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP979.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Asbestos Litigation in the U.S.: A New Look at an Old Issue</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB362z0.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2000</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2000</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;This briefing documents the first phase of a new study on asbestos litigation, now the longest-running mass tort litigation in U.S. history.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB362z0.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Beyond &quot;It Just Ain&apos;t Worth It&quot;: Alternative Strategies for Damage Class Action Reform</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP951.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 2000</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 2000</updated>
   <summary type="html">In this article, the authors explore alternative strategies for class-action reform aimed at improving the cost-benefit ratio of damage class actions.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP951.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Safety in the Skies: Personnel and Parties in NTSB Aviation Accident Investigations</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1122.html</id>
   <published>Jan 1, 2000</published>
   <updated>Jan 1, 2000</updated>
   <summary type="html">In this report, RAND outlines a comprehensive set of recommendations intended to help the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) strengthen the party process, create a more expansive statement of causation, modernize investigative procedures, streamline internal operating procedures, better manage resources, maintain a strategic view of staffing, streamline training practices, improve facilities for engineering and training.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1122.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Safety in the Skies: Personnel and Parties in NTSB Aviation Accident Investigations-Master Volume</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1122z1.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1999</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1999</updated>
   <summary type="html">Adopting a multidisciplinary approach, RAND used a variety of quantitative and qualitative research techniques to assess the National Transportation Safety Board&apos;s (NTSB) operations and processes.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1122z1.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Class Action Dilemmas: Pursuing Public Goals for Private Gain</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR969.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1999</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1999</updated>
   <summary type="html">Class action lawsuits -- allowing one or a few plaintiffs to represent many who seek redress -- have long been controversial.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR969.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Class Action Dilemmas: Pursuing Public Goals for Private Gain, Executive Summary</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR969z1.html</id>
   <published>Jan 1, 1999</published>
   <updated>Jan 1, 1999</updated>
   <summary type="html">Class action lawsuits-allowing one or a few plaintiffs to represent many who seek redress-have long been controversial.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR969z1.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Unveiling the Demographic Action in Class-Action Lawsuits: Two Instructional Cases</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP19991003.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1998</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1998</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Population turnover, cohort survival, and intercohort transmission of effects are concepts widely applicable beyond the customary domains of demographic analysis.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP19991003.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Individuals within the aggregate : relationships, representation, and fees</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP584.html</id>
   <published>Dec 31, 1995</published>
   <updated>Dec 31, 1995</updated>
   <summary type="html">Individuals within the aggregate : relationships, representation, and fees</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP584.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 </feed>

