2012-05-24T14:56:29Z Copyright (c) 2012, The RAND Corporation RAND Corporation http://www.rand.org/topics/combat-service-support.html http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR1204.html May 9, 2012 May 9, 2012

The U.S. Army's two ammunition ports — Military Ocean Terminal Concord (MOTCO) and Military Ocean Terminal Sunny Point (MOTSU) — have different funding approaches; a central question in this research is what the most appropriate financial structure should be. To help answer this question, the authors develop two variations of an ammunition port funding policy, both featuring customers paying marginal costs for port services.

http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP334.html Nov 8, 2011 Nov 8, 2011

The U.S. Army is under pressure to demonstrate a valid need for heavy brigade combat teams in the future security environment — an environment in which many believe that such units will be largely irrelevant. Through an examination of adversary capabilities in recent conflicts, the author explores whether heavy armored forces can be justified as a prominent component of the future U.S. Army.

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG987.html Jun 15, 2010 Jun 15, 2010

<p>While most U.S. government officials working in Iraq believe the use of armed private security contractors has been a useful strategy, many worry that the contractors have not always had a positive effect on U.S. foreign policy objectives.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR740.html Nov 23, 2009 Nov 23, 2009

<p>This report provides historical contextual information on the ages of aircraft designs operated by the Air Force. The authors find that, since the end of World War II, there has been a consistent trend for the Air Force to keep aircraft designs in operation for ever-longer periods. While the mean age of aircraft designs currently in operation is at an all-time high, this has been true throughout the history of the Air Force.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG785.html Feb 24, 2009 Feb 24, 2009

<p>A new metric for measuring expeditionary medical support (EMEDS) and a construct for applying it across three Air Force medical missions: deployed military support, humanitarian relief, and defense support to civil authorities. The new metric focuses on the rate at which each component of the deployment system can evaluate, stabilize, triage, treat, and evacuate patients, or the medical STEP rate, to replace the current inadequate measure, beds.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG559z1.html Mar 10, 2008 Mar 10, 2008

<p>This study examines contingency purchases made in theater to support U.S. Air Force activities during Operation Iraqi Freedom in fiscal years 2003 and 2004. It develops a custom database to determine the types of goods and services purchased and illustrates how such data can be used to facilitate planning and policy decisions associated with future CCO staffing and training, combat support, and sharing of lessons within the theater.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG316.html Aug 31, 2006 Aug 31, 2006

<p>As part of a series on supporting the Air and Space Expeditionary Force, this report looks at the current operational architecture for incorporating combat support command and control (CSC2) and proposes an expanded architecture for the future.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG421.html Aug 8, 2006 Aug 8, 2006

<p>A worldwide combat support basing architecture is one of the major pillars for achieving the U.S. Air Force&rsquo;s goals of global strike and persistent dominance. The authors develop an analytic framework and model for evaluating options for overseas combat support basing and present a feasible set of candidate locations for consideration by the Air Force.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG342.html Jan 20, 2006 Jan 20, 2006

<p>While the major combat operations of Operation Iraqi Freedom were successful, logistical problems still hampered materiel sustainment. Supply chain improvements could help better prepare the U.S. Army for future operations.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG282.html Aug 15, 2005 Aug 15, 2005

<p>Is the Army getting what it needs and managing risks appropriately in its combat service support contracts? This report uses the Army&rsquo;s Balkans Support Contract and a continuous risk-management framework to answer these questions. On the basis of this case study, the authors conclude that the Army has been getting what it needs, though it might, at times, be bearing too much cost-related risk, and that few risks arise directly from the use of contractors. They also see a need for more training for the Army&rsquo;s contracting personnel to better plan, coordinate, and manage contracts.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG151.html Mar 7, 2005 Mar 7, 2005

<p>Despite many advantages, reorganizing the U.S. Air Force into an Air and Space Expeditionary Force places serious demands on combat support infrastructure. Consolidating intermediate maintenance at forward support locations may lessen the burden.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1759.html Jan 1, 2004 Jan 1, 2004

<p>This report summarizes and extends RAND research on process-oriented training for Army combat service support (CSS) command and control (C2) using microworld models. To assess learning outcomes, a model can be devised that uses a multidimensional, objective approach and includes cognitive, skill-based, and affective measures. This approach can additionally pinpoint specific aspects of the training that are problematic.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1717.html Jan 1, 2004 Jan 1, 2004

<p>The inevitability of U.S. armed forces future involvement in urban contingencies worldwide demands that those responsible for arming, manning, sustaining, and otherwise supporting these operations prepare for the challenges inherent in such undertakings. This report gives an overview of these formidable tasks and recommends ways for the U.S. Army combat service support (CSS) community to prepare itself to meet them.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB3037.html Dec 31, 2003 Dec 31, 2003

http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB425.html Dec 31, 2002 Dec 31, 2002

<p>To be a strategically responsive force, the Army must be able to rapidly move or project forces with sufficient power to execute a broad spectrum of missions. This briefing examines the Army&rsquo;s strategies for transforming its combat service support (CSS) activities in support of this power projection goal. The authors aim to provide a common understanding of the strategies the Army is using to improve power projection capability from a CSS perspective and to spur additional application of these strategies.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB3042.html Dec 31, 2002 Dec 31, 2002

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1536.html Jan 1, 2002 Jan 1, 2002

<p>To define the elements of a combat support system to help achieve U.S. Air Force Aerospace Expeditionary Force goals, this report analyzes the current command and control (C2) architecture for combat support. Based on this analysis as well as interviews with Air Force personnel, lessons from the Air War Over Serbia, and doctrinal changes and evolving practices, the authors provide a series of structural concepts to improve execution of C2 and remedy identified shortfalls in the current system.</p>

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1270.html Jan 1, 2001 Jan 1, 2001

Gleaning insights from both the functional and technology perspectives into such areas medical informatics, combat service support, and biological and chemical defense. Identify areas warranting further investigation.

http://www.rand.org/pubs/issue_papers/IP190.html Dec 31, 1999 Dec 31, 1999

This Issue Paper argues that these units may not be as ready to deploy as they need to be and offers some observations about why that might be the case.

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR929.html Jan 1, 1999 Jan 1, 1999

Discusses changes in training structure, content, and methods, with the focus on developing training for CSS staffs operating as staffs, not for individual training.