<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

     <title>RAND Research Topic: Defense Cooperation</title>
     <link rel="self" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/defense-cooperation.xml"/>
     <updated>2012-05-24T14:22:51Z</updated>
     <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/defense-cooperation.html" />
     <rights>Copyright (c) 2012, The RAND Corporation</rights>
     <author>
       <name>RAND Corporation</name>
     </author>
     <id>http://www.rand.org/topics/defense-cooperation.html</id>
	 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Nature of the Chinese-Iranian Partnership and the Challenges It Poses for the U.S.</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP351.html</id>
   <published>May 2, 2012</published>
   <updated>May 2, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">The partnership between China and Iran presents challenges to U.S. interests, including dissuading Iran from developing a nuclear weapons capability. An analysis of the factors driving Chinese-Iranian cooperation offers  policy options for influencing this partnership to meet U.S. objectives.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP351.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Iran&apos;s Calculations in New Diplomatic Talks</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2012/04/17/USIP.html</id>
   <published>Apr 17, 2012</published>
   <updated>Apr 17, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">Beset by economic problems, political divisions, and domestic discontent, Iranian leaders may compromise&amp;mdash;or appear to make compromises&amp;mdash;to cushion the regime from the mounting internal and external pressures, writes Alireza Nader.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2012/04/17/USIP.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Building Partner Country Capacity for Stability Operations</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9627.html</id>
   <published>Dec 16, 2011</published>
   <updated>Dec 16, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Helps to develop an integrated strategy for building partner capacity for stability operations through an analysis of key strategic elements within the context of BPC and stability operations guidance as well as ongoing security cooperation programs.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9627.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Future of Gulf Security in a Region of Dramatic Change: Mutual Equities and Enduring Relationships</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/conf_proceedings/CF293.html</id>
   <published>Dec 16, 2011</published>
   <updated>Dec 16, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The June 2011 conference titled &quot;Gulf Security in a Region of Dramatic Change: Mutual Equities and Enduring Partnerships&quot; included discussion of the Arab Spring, the prospects for and implications of a more-unified Gulf Cooperation Council, how Gulf militaries and their relationships with the United States may be affected by political changes, how present-day events may influence or alter the threat posed by Iran, and how CENTCOM may be affected.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/conf_proceedings/CF293.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Learning from Experience</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1128.html</id>
   <published>Dec 9, 2011</published>
   <updated>Dec 9, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Large, complex submarine design and construction programs demand personnel with unique skills and capabilities supplemented with practical experiences in their areas of expertise. Recognizing the importance of past experiences for successful program management, the governments of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Commonwealth of Australia asked the RAND Corporation to develop a set of lessons learned from previous submarine programs that could help inform future program managers. The four volumes in this set present lessons learned from the &lt;em&gt;Ohio&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Seawolf&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;Virginia&lt;/em&gt; programs of the United States; the &lt;em&gt;Astute&lt;/em&gt; program of the United Kingdom; and the &lt;em&gt;Collins&lt;/em&gt; program of Australia.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1128.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Developing U.S. Army Officers&apos; Capabilities for Joint, Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Multinational Environments</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9631.html</id>
   <published>Dec 6, 2011</published>
   <updated>Dec 6, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Identifies and describes the knowledge, skills, and abilities that enable Army officers to succeed in joint, interagency, intergovernmental, and multinational contexts.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9631.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Learning from Experience: Volume III: Lessons from the United Kingdom&apos;s &lt;em&gt;Astute&lt;/em&gt; Submarine Program</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1128z3.html</id>
   <published>Nov 16, 2011</published>
   <updated>Nov 16, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">This volume presents a set of lessons learned from the United Kingdom&apos;s &lt;em&gt;Astute&lt;/em&gt; submarine program that could help inform future program managers. Designing and building a submarine requires careful management and oversight and a delegation of roles and responsibilities that recognizes which party &amp;mdash; the shipbuilder or the government &amp;mdash; is best positioned to manage risks.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1128z3.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Learning from Experience:  Volume II: Lessons from the U.S. Navy&apos;s &lt;em&gt;Ohio&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Seawolf&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;Virginia&lt;/em&gt; Submarine Programs</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1128z2.html</id>
   <published>Nov 16, 2011</published>
   <updated>Nov 16, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The U.S. Navy asked the RAND Corporation to develop a set of lessons learned from previous submarine programs that could help inform future program managers. This volume presents lessons from three U.S. submarine programs. The RAND team looked at how the programs were managed, the issues that affected management decisions, and the outcomes of those decisions. An overarching lesson from the three programs is the importance of program stability.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1128z2.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Learning from Experience: Volume IV: Lessons from Australia&apos;s &lt;em&gt;Collins&lt;/em&gt; Submarine Program</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1128z4.html</id>
   <published>Nov 16, 2011</published>
   <updated>Nov 16, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">This volume presents a set of lessons learned from Australia&apos;s &lt;em&gt;Collins&lt;/em&gt; submarine program that could help inform future program managers. &lt;em&gt;Collins&lt;/em&gt; was the first submarine built in Australia. RAND investigated how operational requirements were set for the &lt;em&gt;Collins&lt;/em&gt; class; explored the acquisition, contracting, design, and build processes that the program employed; and assessed the activities surrounding integrated logistics support for the class.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1128z4.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Lessons from the Submarine Programs of the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1128z1.html</id>
   <published>Nov 16, 2011</published>
   <updated>Nov 16, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">An examination of five submarine programs in the three countries&amp;mdash;the UK&apos;s &lt;em&gt;Astute&lt;/em&gt; program; the U.S. Navy&apos;s &lt;em&gt;Ohio&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Seawolf&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;Virginia&lt;/em&gt; programs; and Australia&apos;s &lt;em&gt;Collins&lt;/em&gt; program&amp;mdash;identifies lessons that could help inform future program managers.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1128z1.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">An Open Door in Libya</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2011/10/20/CNN.html</id>
   <published>Oct 20, 2011</published>
   <updated>Oct 20, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The days and weeks after a victory like this are a golden hour that set in motion either a virtuous cycle of increasing security and economic growth, or a downward spiral into insecurity, factionalism and economic chaos, write Christopher S. Chivvis and Frederic Wehrey.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2011/10/20/CNN.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Security from the Bottom Up</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2011/10/07/TIME.html</id>
   <published>Oct 7, 2011</published>
   <updated>Oct 7, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">If the Afghan government is to have a chance of defeating the Taliban, its national-security forces must successfully leverage the country&apos;s many competing factions, village by village, writes Seth G. Jones.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2011/10/07/TIME.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Lessons from U.S. Allies in Security Cooperation with Third Countries: The Cases of Australia, France, and the United Kingdom</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR972.html</id>
   <published>Oct 5, 2011</published>
   <updated>Oct 5, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Several key U.S. allies engage in security cooperation, albeit on a smaller scale than the United States. To see what the U.S. Air Force can learn from these efforts, the authors examined how and why three allies &amp;mdash; Australia, France, and the United Kingdom &amp;mdash; provide security cooperation and highlight three key areas that could benefit from further collaboration: staff talks, exercises, and training followed by exercises.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR972.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Integrating the Full Range of Security Cooperation Programs into Air Force Planning: An Analytic Primer</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR974.html</id>
   <published>Sep 29, 2011</published>
   <updated>Sep 29, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The Air Force and other Defense Department entities conduct a host of security cooperation activities with partner air forces. However, there is currently no process for systematically tracking all these programs and activities. This report supplies Air Force planners with more-accessible information about resources for security cooperation, the rules that govern their use, and their application methods.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR974.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Assessing the U.S. Air Force Unified Engagement Building Partnerships Seminars</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB605.html</id>
   <published>Sep 27, 2011</published>
   <updated>Sep 27, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">These seminars support Unified Engagement, a biannual wargame, by engaging partner countries in tabletop exercises to develop inputs for the larger game and enhance regional security cooperation. Using the RAND security cooperation assessment framework RAND assessed two seminars and recommended a series of enhancements, including setting measurable objectives, identifying and involving other stakeholders, and establishing follow-up mechanisms.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB605.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">How Successful Are U.S. Efforts to Build Capacity in Developing Countries? A Framework to Assess the Global Train and Equip &quot;1206&quot; Program</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR1121.html</id>
   <published>Sep 14, 2011</published>
   <updated>Sep 14, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The Global Train and Equip &quot;1206&quot; Program is a multiagency security cooperation program that supports U.S.-led capacity-building activities focused on counterterrorism and stability operations with foreign military partners. Interviews with policymakers and subject-matter experts, combined with a survey of program stakeholders, revealed some challenges and best approaches to establishing an assessment framework for 1206 Program projects.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR1121.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Assessing the Effectiveness of the International Counterproliferation Program</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR981.html</id>
   <published>Sep 12, 2011</published>
   <updated>Sep 12, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">To effectively confront the threat of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the United States relies on the will and capacity of international partners for assistance. It requires international cooperation, including security cooperation programs to enhance partner capacity. Assessing the impact of these efforts is inherently difficult. This report demonstrates how one assessment framework can be applied to these programs.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR981.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Security Force Assistance in Afghanistan</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1066.html</id>
   <published>Sep 11, 2011</published>
   <updated>Sep 11, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Security force assistance (SFA) is a central pillar of the counterinsurgency campaign being waged by U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan. An analysis of SFA efforts documents U.S. and international approaches to building the Afghan National Security Forces from 2001 to 2009 and provides recommendations and their implications for the U.S Army.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1066.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">From Insurgency to Stability: Volume I: Key Capabilities and Practices</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1111z1.html</id>
   <published>Sep 7, 2011</published>
   <updated>Sep 7, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">This book identifies the procedures and capabilities that the U.S. Department of Defense, other agencies of the U.S. government, U.S. allies and partners, and international organizations require in order to support the transition from counterinsurgency, when the military takes primary responsibility for security and economic operations, to stability and reconstruction, when police and civilian government agencies take the lead.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1111z1.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">From Insurgency to Stability: Volume II: Insights from Selected Case Studies</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1111z2.html</id>
   <published>Sep 7, 2011</published>
   <updated>Sep 7, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">This book examines six case studies of insurgencies from around the world to determine the key factors necessary for a successful transition from counterinsurgency to a more stable situation. The authors review the causes of each insurgency and the key players involved, and examine what the government did right &amp;mdash; or wrong &amp;mdash; to bring the insurgency to an end and to transition to greater stability.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1111z2.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 </feed>

