<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

     <title>RAND Research Topic: Defense Infrastructure</title>
     <link rel="self" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/defense-infrastructure.xml"/>
     <updated>2012-05-24T20:26:23Z</updated>
     <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://www.rand.org/topics/defense-infrastructure.html" />
     <rights>Copyright (c) 2012, The RAND Corporation</rights>
     <author>
       <name>RAND Corporation</name>
     </author>
     <id>http://www.rand.org/topics/defense-infrastructure.html</id>
	 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">DoD Renewable Fuels Investment Premature</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/commentary/2012/05/23/NJ.html</id>
   <published>May 23, 2012</published>
   <updated>May 23, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">Technological development challenges suggest that it is highly unlikely that advanced approaches for producing hydrotreated renewable oils suitable for military applications will constitute an important fraction of the commercial fuel market until well beyond the next decade, writes Keith Crane.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/commentary/2012/05/23/NJ.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Obituary: Glenn A. Kent, National Security Strategist, Senior RAND Research Fellow</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2012/04/26.html</id>
   <published>Apr 26, 2012</published>
   <updated>Apr 26, 2012</updated>
   <summary type="html">Lt. Gen. Glenn A. Kent, a strategist, analyst and teacher whose career spanned World War II, the Cold War and the post-Cold War eras, died April 25. </summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2012/04/26.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Standing Up a More Capable Joint Task Force Headquarters</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9625.html</id>
   <published>Nov 18, 2011</published>
   <updated>Nov 18, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The U.S. Army needs to improve its ability to command and control joint, interagency, and multinational forces in diverse environments, and to prepare Army headquarters to perform as components of, or headquarters for, joint task forces.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9625.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Targets for Marine Corps Purchasing and Supply Management Initiatives: Spend Analysis Findings</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB512.html</id>
   <published>Oct 13, 2011</published>
   <updated>Oct 13, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Moore et al. provide a first-order analysis of Marine Corps (USMC) DD350 purchases and Defense Logistics Agency purchases on behalf of the USMC, revealing many indicators of opportunities and challenges for purchasing and supply management initiatives. Data on purchases indicate corporate contracts grouping several individual sole-source contracts may allow the USMC to leverage its purchasing power for more favorable terms and conditions.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB512.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Preserving Range and Airspace Access for the Air Force Mission: Striving for a Strategic Vantage Point</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR874.html</id>
   <published>May 17, 2011</published>
   <updated>May 17, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Air Force range managers are responsible for scheduling the ranges and infrastructures units need for critical, realistic testing and training, sometimes on short notice. They must also supply associated requirements, which requires information and understanding. To aid this, the authors offer an example method that marries the Center Scheduling Enterprise with an update of an existing RAND tool (provided on CD).</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR874.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Influences on the Adoption of Multifactor Authentication</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR937.html</id>
   <published>Apr 15, 2011</published>
   <updated>Apr 15, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">Passwords are proving less and less capable of protecting computer systems from abuse. Multifactor authentication (MFA) &#8212; which combines something you know (e.g., a PIN), something you have (e.g., a token), and/or something you are (e.g., a fingerprint) &#8212; is increasingly being required. This report investigates why organizations choose to adopt or not adopt MFA &#8212; and where they choose to use it.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR937.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Effects of Changing Aircraft Carrier Procurement Schedules</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1073.html</id>
   <published>Mar 21, 2011</published>
   <updated>Mar 21, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The Secretary of Defense&apos;s plans to shift Navy aircraft carrier acquisition to every five years should have little impact on force structure and the industrial base in the next decade&amp;mdash;but after that, the force structure shrinks, as does the chance of meeting goals for the number of deployed aircraft carriers. </summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1073.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">A Methodology for Comparing Costs and Benefits of Management Alternatives for F-22 Sustainment</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR763.html</id>
   <published>Feb 16, 2011</published>
   <updated>Feb 16, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The U.S. Air Force asked RAND Project AIR FORCE to perform a congressionally required assessment of contractor versus organic management of F-22 air vehicle and F119 engine sustainment to determine the most cost-effective approach. The methodology involved the development of notional government sustainment organizations and a consideration of a variety of factors relevant to such a decision, including the asserted benefits of each approach.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR763.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Sustaining Key Skills in the UK Military Aircraft Industry</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1023.html</id>
   <published>Feb 6, 2011</published>
   <updated>Feb 6, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The UK Ministry of Defence&apos;s Fixed Wing Sector Strategy Board commissioned RAND Europe to assist in the development of a strategy and sustainment plan for the military fixed wing sector.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1023.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Sustaining Key Skills in the United Kingdom&apos;s Military Aircraft Industry</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9545.html</id>
   <published>Jan 31, 2011</published>
   <updated>Jan 31, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">The UK currently has the industrial skills needed to develop, produce and maintain its military aircraft, but predicted future demand for design engineering activity is insufficient to sustain a number of key skills beyond the 2010-2019 decade.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9545.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">No Direct Military Benefit from Use of Alternative Fuels by Armed Forces</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG969.html</id>
   <published>Jan 24, 2011</published>
   <updated>Jan 24, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">If the U.S. military increases its use of alternative fuels, there will be no direct benefit to the nation&apos;s armed forces. It makes more sense for the military to direct its efforts toward using energy more efficiently.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG969.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">No Direct Military Benefit from Use of Alternative Fuels by Armed Forces</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/news/press/2011/01/25.html</id>
   <published>Jan 24, 2011</published>
   <updated>Jan 24, 2011</updated>
   <summary type="html">If the U.S. military increases its use of alternative fuels, there will be no direct benefit to the nation&apos;s armed forces.</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/news/press/2011/01/25.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Developing a Defense Sector Assessment Rating Tool</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR864.html</id>
   <published>Sep 17, 2010</published>
   <updated>Sep 17, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;In response to the lack of a comprehensive tool to assess a country&apos;s defense sector and its ability to counter a range of security threats, a RAND team developed the Defense Sector Assessment Rating Tool (DSART). The tool consists of six assessments to quantitatively and qualitatively determine a country&apos;s defense sector capabilities and potential areas for reform, and it is designed so that it can be adapted to a changing security environment.&lt;/p&gt;
</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR864.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Navy Network Dependability: Models, Metrics, and Tools</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1003.html</id>
   <published>Aug 6, 2010</published>
   <updated>Aug 6, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The Navy is increasingly dependent on networks and associated net-centric operations to conduct military missions, so a vital goal is to establish and maintain dependable networks for ship and multiship networks. The authors develop a framework for measuring the dependability of naval networks and describe a software tool for modeling the impact that individual network components have on overall mission operational availability.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1003.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Are Law and Policy Clear and Consistent? Roles and Responsibilities of the Defense Acquisition Executive and the Chief Information Officer</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG958.html</id>
   <published>Aug 6, 2010</published>
   <updated>Aug 6, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The roles and responsibilities of defense acquisition officers and chief information officers are governed both by U.S. laws and by Department of Defense (DoD) policy. The authors identify policy governing the design, acquisition, and integration of information technology (IT) and national security systems (NSS) that could lead to potential conflicts among these executives when they exercise their duties in the defense acquisition system, and suggest changes to DoD policy that can resolve these conflicts.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG958.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Enhancing Army Joint Force Headquarters Capabilities</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG675.html</id>
   <published>Jul 7, 2010</published>
   <updated>Jul 7, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The research in this document is aimed at helping the Army improve its ability to command and control joint, interagency, and multinational forces to accomplish diverse missions in a range of settings. A particular emphasis was placed on suggesting innovative ways to prepare Army headquarters, including Divisions, Corps, and Theater Armies, to perform as components of, or headquarters for, joint task forces.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG675.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Strengths and Weaknesses of the Netherlands Armed Forces: A Strategic Survey</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR690.html</id>
   <published>Apr 22, 2010</published>
   <updated>Apr 22, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;To inform Netherlands future defence planning, RAND Europe identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the Netherlands armed forces, focusing on recent Netherlands deployments relative to the deployments of other countries.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR690.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Implications of Aggregated DoD Information Systems for Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG951.html</id>
   <published>Mar 3, 2010</published>
   <updated>Mar 3, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The challenge of securing U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) information systems has grown significantly. A new approach to information assurance certification and accreditation (IA C&amp;amp;A) is needed to effectively extend the IA C&amp;amp;A process to aggregations of systems and improve their security. An examination of current policy shows that a number of changes could enable the IA C&amp;amp;A of aggregations of DoD information systems on a common platform.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG951.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">Incorporating Sustainability into Army Installation Plans</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG837.html</id>
   <published>Jan 20, 2010</published>
   <updated>Jan 20, 2010</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Given the experiences of industry and communities, many Army installations have started to develop and implement installation sustainability plans, which document long-range plans addressing mission, community, and environmental issues developed through a strategic planning process.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG837.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 <entry>
   <title type="html">The Long March: Building an Afghan National Army</title>
   <id>http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG845.html</id>
   <published>Jun 1, 2009</published>
   <updated>Jun 1, 2009</updated>
   <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The Afghan National Army (ANA) is critical to the success of achieving a stable Afghanistan. This monograph assesses the ANA&apos;s progress and finds that though it has come a long way since the outset of the recent conflict in the country, the United States will play a crucial role in Afghanistan for the foreseeable future.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/xhtml" hreflang="en" title="Read More" href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG845.html" />
   
 </entry>
 
 </feed>

